A praxeological review of concept-sequence and series: Comparing Malaysia and Indonesia textbooks

Rahmat Kusharyadi, S. Fatimah, Kusnandi Kusnandi
{"title":"A praxeological review of concept-sequence and series: Comparing Malaysia and Indonesia textbooks","authors":"Rahmat Kusharyadi, S. Fatimah, Kusnandi Kusnandi","doi":"10.29408/jel.v10i2.24079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malaysia, through its curriculum, has implemented mathematics textbooks as the main source. However, not all concepts can be offered to a country. This research aims to analyse the comparison between Indonesian and Malaysian textbooks from a praxeological perspective . The data used is only on the topic of sequences and series. This qualitative research adopts a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, serving as an alternative method. In the context of the Indonesian version of didactic design, this study represents research conducted during the prospective stage of the entire research series. The results of the research show that in the praxis block, there are similarities in the presentation of Indonesian and Malaysian textbooks in introducing the topic of sequences and series. The difference is that in Indonesian mathematics textbooks there are 2 themes, while in Malaysia there is only 1 theme. The design in Malaysian textbooks is more in-depth and comprehensive, and the learning trajectory is arranged more systematically so that Malaysian textbooks allow for no gaps between the types of T used. The use of Malaysian textbooks has the potential to build complete knowledge, so the potential for students to have difficulties will be smaller.","PeriodicalId":496141,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Elemen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Elemen","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i2.24079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malaysia, through its curriculum, has implemented mathematics textbooks as the main source. However, not all concepts can be offered to a country. This research aims to analyse the comparison between Indonesian and Malaysian textbooks from a praxeological perspective . The data used is only on the topic of sequences and series. This qualitative research adopts a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, serving as an alternative method. In the context of the Indonesian version of didactic design, this study represents research conducted during the prospective stage of the entire research series. The results of the research show that in the praxis block, there are similarities in the presentation of Indonesian and Malaysian textbooks in introducing the topic of sequences and series. The difference is that in Indonesian mathematics textbooks there are 2 themes, while in Malaysia there is only 1 theme. The design in Malaysian textbooks is more in-depth and comprehensive, and the learning trajectory is arranged more systematically so that Malaysian textbooks allow for no gaps between the types of T used. The use of Malaysian textbooks has the potential to build complete knowledge, so the potential for students to have difficulties will be smaller.
概念-序列和系列的实践论回顾:比较马来西亚和印度尼西亚的教科书
马来西亚通过其课程将数学教科书作为主要来源。然而,并非所有概念都能提供给一个国家。本研究旨在从实践论的角度分析印度尼西亚和马来西亚教科书之间的比较。所使用的数据仅涉及序列和数列主题。本定性研究采用诠释学现象学方法,作为一种替代方法。在印尼版教学设计的背景下,本研究是在整个研究系列的前瞻性阶段进行的研究。研究结果表明,在实践模块中,印尼和马来西亚的教科书在介绍序列和数列主题时有相似之处。不同之处在于,印尼的数学教科书有两个主题,而马来西亚的数学教科书只有一个主题。马来西亚教科书的设计更加深入和全面,学习轨迹的安排也更加系统,因此马来西亚教科书所使用的T类型之间没有空隙。使用马来西亚教科书有可能构建完整的知识,因此学生遇到困难的可能性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信