3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a prospective clinical trial up to 1 year

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Paniz Hobbi, Tugçe Merve Ordueri, F. Öztürk-Bozkurt, T. Toz-Akalın, Muzaffer Ateş, M. Özcan
{"title":"3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a prospective clinical trial up to 1 year","authors":"Paniz Hobbi, Tugçe Merve Ordueri, F. Öztürk-Bozkurt, T. Toz-Akalın, Muzaffer Ateş, M. Özcan","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1390600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This clinical trial evaluated the clinical behavior of 3D-printed posterior resin composite fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).Between 10 October 2020 and 5 August 2022, 49 patients aged 19–60 years (16 men, 33 women) received 68 3D-printed resin composite 3-unit posterior FDPs (ELS Even Stronger, Saremco, Switzerland). FDPs were followed up 2 weeks after placement (baseline), 6 months after placement, and 1 year after placement by two independent calibrated observers using modified FDI criteria for anatomical form, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, color match, fracture of material, staining surface, staining margin, approximate anatomical form, retention, gingival health, and patient's view. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier analyses.A total of 59 restorations were evaluated and the mean observation period was 8.63 months. Failure types were categorized as mechanical and biological. Failures were observed in 14 FDPs. Nine FDPs showed mechanical failure and five FDPs showed biological failure. Mechanical failures were mostly experienced as connector fractures. Eight FDPs showed cohesive fractures (seven in a single connector at either at the mesial or distal and one in the pontic itself). Biological failures, including root canal treatment and gingival tissue reactions, were observed within the first 6 months. Based on mechanical failures, the survival rate was 86.7% including the biological complications; this corresponded to 71.6% (Kaplan–Meier). After 1 year, two FDPs showed surface luster loss (score 4), two-color mismatches (score 4), and two-surface staining (score 4).3D-printed resin composite FDPs were observed acceptable after 1 year of clinical follow-up, providing that the experienced failure types were mainly associated with fractures in the connector region, which requires revision of design parameters.Clinical Trials.Gov, NCT04600297.","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1390600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This clinical trial evaluated the clinical behavior of 3D-printed posterior resin composite fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).Between 10 October 2020 and 5 August 2022, 49 patients aged 19–60 years (16 men, 33 women) received 68 3D-printed resin composite 3-unit posterior FDPs (ELS Even Stronger, Saremco, Switzerland). FDPs were followed up 2 weeks after placement (baseline), 6 months after placement, and 1 year after placement by two independent calibrated observers using modified FDI criteria for anatomical form, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, color match, fracture of material, staining surface, staining margin, approximate anatomical form, retention, gingival health, and patient's view. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier analyses.A total of 59 restorations were evaluated and the mean observation period was 8.63 months. Failure types were categorized as mechanical and biological. Failures were observed in 14 FDPs. Nine FDPs showed mechanical failure and five FDPs showed biological failure. Mechanical failures were mostly experienced as connector fractures. Eight FDPs showed cohesive fractures (seven in a single connector at either at the mesial or distal and one in the pontic itself). Biological failures, including root canal treatment and gingival tissue reactions, were observed within the first 6 months. Based on mechanical failures, the survival rate was 86.7% including the biological complications; this corresponded to 71.6% (Kaplan–Meier). After 1 year, two FDPs showed surface luster loss (score 4), two-color mismatches (score 4), and two-surface staining (score 4).3D-printed resin composite FDPs were observed acceptable after 1 year of clinical follow-up, providing that the experienced failure types were mainly associated with fractures in the connector region, which requires revision of design parameters.Clinical Trials.Gov, NCT04600297.
三维打印树脂复合材料后固定义齿:长达 1 年的前瞻性临床试验
在 2020 年 10 月 10 日至 2022 年 8 月 5 日期间,49 名年龄在 19-60 岁之间的患者(16 名男性,33 名女性)接受了 68 个三维打印树脂复合材料 3 单元后部 FDP(ELS Even Stronger,瑞士 Saremco 公司)。由两名独立的校准观察者使用改良的 FDI 标准,对 FDP 放置后 2 周(基线)、放置后 6 个月和放置后 1 年进行了随访,这些标准包括解剖形态、继发龋、边缘适应性、表面粗糙度、颜色匹配、材料断裂、染色面、染色边缘、近似解剖形态、固位、牙龈健康和患者观点。共评估了 59 个修复体,平均观察期为 8.63 个月。故障类型分为机械故障和生物故障。在 14 个 FDP 中观察到了失败。其中 9 个 FDP 出现机械故障,5 个 FDP 出现生物故障。机械故障主要表现为连接器断裂。8 个 FDP 出现了粘连性骨折(7 个发生在中轴或远轴上的单个连接体上,1 个发生在桥体本身)。在最初的 6 个月内,出现了包括根管治疗和牙龈组织反应在内的生物学故障。根据机械故障的情况,包括生物并发症在内的存活率为 86.7%;这相当于 71.6%(Kaplan-Meier)。临床随访一年后,观察到 3D 打印树脂复合材料 FDP 是可接受的,但出现的故障类型主要与连接器区域的断裂有关,这就需要修改设计参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信