The Role of 5% Minoxidil versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Alopecia Areata.

Rabia Ghafoor, Najmus Saher, Syeda Mahanum Ali
{"title":"The Role of 5% Minoxidil <em>versus</em> Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Alopecia Areata.","authors":"Rabia Ghafoor, Najmus Saher, Syeda Mahanum Ali","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.06.650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of topical minoxidil and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomised control trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Dermatology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan, from December 2021 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included all the patients who visited JPMC Karachi during the study period. Permission from the ERB was obtained. The inclusion criteria were any gender and age 10 to 45 years. Topical minoxidil 5% solution was applied twice daily to Group A (six pubs/time), while PRP injections were administered to Group B at baseline and every four weeks for three months. Serial photos and the severity of alopecia tool (SALT) were used to determine the clinical assessment. When comparing the effectiveness between the two groups, a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 23 was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 23.11 ± 8.9 years in 376 patients. PRP and Minoxidil groups had mean SALT scores at three months that were 1.48 and 1.54, respectively. Both treatments were shown to be efficacious. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the minoxidil solution and PRP (p = 0.483).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no apparent difference between PRP and topical minoxidil 5% solution in the management of AA. To verify the results, additional studies are needed with a larger sample size and a longer duration of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Minoxidil, Platelet-rich plasma, Alopecia areata, Severity of alopecia tool score.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.06.650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of topical minoxidil and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA).

Study design: Randomised control trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Dermatology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan, from December 2021 to June 2022.

Methodology: The study included all the patients who visited JPMC Karachi during the study period. Permission from the ERB was obtained. The inclusion criteria were any gender and age 10 to 45 years. Topical minoxidil 5% solution was applied twice daily to Group A (six pubs/time), while PRP injections were administered to Group B at baseline and every four weeks for three months. Serial photos and the severity of alopecia tool (SALT) were used to determine the clinical assessment. When comparing the effectiveness between the two groups, a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 23 was used to analyse the data.

Results: Mean age was 23.11 ± 8.9 years in 376 patients. PRP and Minoxidil groups had mean SALT scores at three months that were 1.48 and 1.54, respectively. Both treatments were shown to be efficacious. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the minoxidil solution and PRP (p = 0.483).

Conclusion: There is no apparent difference between PRP and topical minoxidil 5% solution in the management of AA. To verify the results, additional studies are needed with a larger sample size and a longer duration of follow-up.

Key words: Minoxidil, Platelet-rich plasma, Alopecia areata, Severity of alopecia tool score.

5% 米诺地尔与富血小板血浆在治疗脱发中的作用。
研究目的比较米诺地尔外用药和富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗斑秃(AA)的疗效:随机对照试验。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦卡拉奇真纳研究生医疗中心皮肤科,2021年12月至2022年6月:研究对象包括在研究期间到卡拉奇金纳研究生医疗中心就诊的所有患者。研究获得了 ERB 的许可。纳入标准为任何性别,年龄在 10 至 45 岁之间。A 组患者每天使用两次 5%米诺地尔外用溶液(六次/次),B 组患者在基线期和每四周注射一次 PRP,持续三个月。临床评估采用序列照片和脱发严重程度工具(SALT)。比较两组的疗效时,P 值为 0:376名患者的平均年龄为(23.11 ± 8.9)岁。PRP 组和 Minoxidil 组在三个月后的 SALT 平均得分分别为 1.48 和 1.54。两种疗法均显示出疗效。米诺地尔溶液和 PRP 的疗效在统计学上没有明显差异(P = 0.483):结论:PRP 和 5%米诺地尔局部溶液在治疗 AA 方面没有明显差异。结论:PRP 和 5%米诺地尔外用溶液在治疗 AA 方面没有明显差异。为验证结果,需要进行更多样本量更大、随访时间更长的研究:米诺地尔 富血小板血浆 斑秃 脱发严重程度工具评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信