Audit of an in-patient palliative care quality improvement process for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a South African teaching hospital.
U K Kotze, R Krause, M Bernon, L Gwyther, J Olivier, E Jonas
{"title":"Audit of an in-patient palliative care quality improvement process for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a South African teaching hospital.","authors":"U K Kotze, R Krause, M Bernon, L Gwyther, J Olivier, E Jonas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor survival rates. Timeously introduced palliative care (PC) improves the quality of life (QoL) for patients with terminal diseases. In 2020, an in-patient PC-quality improvement (QI) programme was implemented for PDAC patients. This study compared PC outcomes before and after the introduction of the PC-QI programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focus group identified five critical intervention areas that could improve care. These were in-patient PC referral, pain and symptom control, shared decision-making, interdisciplinary collaborative care, and continuity of care. A hospital record audit of PDAC patients was conducted in pre- and post-implementation cohorts, and the results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 (2017 pre-PC-QI) and 39 (2022 post-PC-QI) patient records were audited. Demography, symptom duration, referral delay, and clinical findings were similar in both cohorts. In-patient PC referrals improved significantly from 54.4% in 2017 to 82.1% in 2022 (<i>p</i> = 0.0059). Significant improvements were also recorded in shared decisionmaking, collaboration, and continuity of care, while the reassessment of pain and symptoms after treatment improved. Fewer invasive procedures were done in the 2022 cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.0056). The delay from admission to an invasive diagnostic procedure decreased from a mean of 8.7 to 1.5 days (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The duration of hospital admission, overall survival (OS), and readmissions during the final 30 days of life were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The QI programme resulted in improved use of the in-hospital PC service and made better use of scarce resources. Increasing patient and family participation and feedback will further inform the development of the quality of PC services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 2","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor survival rates. Timeously introduced palliative care (PC) improves the quality of life (QoL) for patients with terminal diseases. In 2020, an in-patient PC-quality improvement (QI) programme was implemented for PDAC patients. This study compared PC outcomes before and after the introduction of the PC-QI programme.
Methods: A focus group identified five critical intervention areas that could improve care. These were in-patient PC referral, pain and symptom control, shared decision-making, interdisciplinary collaborative care, and continuity of care. A hospital record audit of PDAC patients was conducted in pre- and post-implementation cohorts, and the results were compared.
Results: A total of 68 (2017 pre-PC-QI) and 39 (2022 post-PC-QI) patient records were audited. Demography, symptom duration, referral delay, and clinical findings were similar in both cohorts. In-patient PC referrals improved significantly from 54.4% in 2017 to 82.1% in 2022 (p = 0.0059). Significant improvements were also recorded in shared decisionmaking, collaboration, and continuity of care, while the reassessment of pain and symptoms after treatment improved. Fewer invasive procedures were done in the 2022 cohort (p = 0.0056). The delay from admission to an invasive diagnostic procedure decreased from a mean of 8.7 to 1.5 days (p = 0.0001). The duration of hospital admission, overall survival (OS), and readmissions during the final 30 days of life were similar.
Conclusion: The QI programme resulted in improved use of the in-hospital PC service and made better use of scarce resources. Increasing patient and family participation and feedback will further inform the development of the quality of PC services.
期刊介绍:
The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.