Changing Dermatologic Procedural Patterns in the Medicare Population: A National Trend Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004263
Christian Gronbeck, Neelesh P Jain, Albert E Zhou, Brett Sloan, Hao Feng
{"title":"Changing Dermatologic Procedural Patterns in the Medicare Population: A National Trend Analysis.","authors":"Christian Gronbeck, Neelesh P Jain, Albert E Zhou, Brett Sloan, Hao Feng","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatologists are trained in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cutaneous lesions, yet comparative trends for basic dermatologic procedures across dermatology providers are lacking at the national level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To trend common dermatologic procedures among general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, primary care providers or primary care physicians (PCPs), and nonphysician clinicians (NPCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal analysis of 2016 to 2021 Medicare Public Use Files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aggregate dermatologic procedural volume decreased 3.0%. Procedural volume declined among general dermatologists (-11.7%), Mohs surgeons (-16.7%), and PCPs (-41.7%) but increased among NPCs (+57.5%). The proportion of procedures by general dermatologists decreased substantially for premalignant destructions (-6.2%), skin biopsies and shave removals (-4.7%), and malignant excisions (-4.1%) and more notably in counties that were nonmetro (-7.1%), low in income (-6.1%), and with <4.0 dermatologists per 100,000 population (-7.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aggregate procedural volume decreased across the study period with general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, and PCPs performing a progressively smaller proportion. The increase in procedures by NPCs may help to address demand but underscores the value of formalized procedural training. The procedural decline by general dermatologists in rural and low-income counties and those with baseline dermatologist shortages may exacerbate existing unmet need. Primary limitation included lack of commercial data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1017-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dermatologists are trained in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cutaneous lesions, yet comparative trends for basic dermatologic procedures across dermatology providers are lacking at the national level.

Objective: To trend common dermatologic procedures among general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, primary care providers or primary care physicians (PCPs), and nonphysician clinicians (NPCs).

Methods: Longitudinal analysis of 2016 to 2021 Medicare Public Use Files.

Results: Aggregate dermatologic procedural volume decreased 3.0%. Procedural volume declined among general dermatologists (-11.7%), Mohs surgeons (-16.7%), and PCPs (-41.7%) but increased among NPCs (+57.5%). The proportion of procedures by general dermatologists decreased substantially for premalignant destructions (-6.2%), skin biopsies and shave removals (-4.7%), and malignant excisions (-4.1%) and more notably in counties that were nonmetro (-7.1%), low in income (-6.1%), and with <4.0 dermatologists per 100,000 population (-7.0%).

Conclusion: Aggregate procedural volume decreased across the study period with general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, and PCPs performing a progressively smaller proportion. The increase in procedures by NPCs may help to address demand but underscores the value of formalized procedural training. The procedural decline by general dermatologists in rural and low-income counties and those with baseline dermatologist shortages may exacerbate existing unmet need. Primary limitation included lack of commercial data.

医疗保险人群中不断变化的皮肤科手术模式:全国趋势分析。
背景:皮肤科医生在皮肤病变的诊断和治疗程序方面接受过培训,但在全国范围内,不同皮肤科医疗机构的基本皮肤病治疗程序缺乏比较趋势:对普通皮肤科医生、莫斯外科医生、初级保健提供者或初级保健医生(PCPs)以及非医生临床医师(NPCs)的常见皮肤科手术进行趋势分析:对2016年至2021年医疗保险公共使用档案进行纵向分析:皮肤科总手术量减少了 3.0%。普通皮肤科医生(-11.7%)、莫斯外科医生(-16.7%)和初级保健医生(-41.7%)的手术量有所下降,但全科医生(+57.5%)的手术量有所上升。普通皮肤科医生的手术比例在恶性肿瘤前切除术(-6.2%)、皮肤活检和刮除术(-4.7%)以及恶性肿瘤切除术(-4.1%)方面大幅下降,在非都会区(-7.1%)、低收入(-6.1%)和有结论的县中更为明显:在整个研究期间,手术总量有所下降,普通皮肤科医生、莫斯外科医生和初级保健医生的手术比例逐渐降低。非全科医生手术量的增加可能有助于满足需求,但也凸显了正规化手术培训的价值。在农村和低收入县以及皮肤科医生基本短缺的县,普通皮肤科医生的手术量减少可能会加剧现有的未满足需求。主要局限性包括缺乏商业数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信