Asking women with diabetes about sexual problems: An exploratory study of NHS professionals' attitudes and practice

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Joanna Clare Murphy, Debbie Cooke, David Griffiths, Emily Setty, Kirsty Winkley-Bryant
{"title":"Asking women with diabetes about sexual problems: An exploratory study of NHS professionals' attitudes and practice","authors":"Joanna Clare Murphy,&nbsp;Debbie Cooke,&nbsp;David Griffiths,&nbsp;Emily Setty,&nbsp;Kirsty Winkley-Bryant","doi":"10.1111/dme.15370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To explore UK healthcare professionals' practice and attitudes towards asking women with diabetes about sexual health problems, including symptoms of female sexual dysfunction (FSD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An online questionnaire to address the study aims was developed, piloted by ten healthcare professionals (HCPs) and completed by 111 eligible HCPs, recruited via professional networks and social media. Free text data were analysed and reported thematically. Two questions were analysed to test the hypothesis of differences between men's and women's responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The majority of respondents did not ask women with diabetes about sexual problems. Multiple barriers to inquiry were reported, including inadequate training, time constraints, competing priorities, the perceived likelihood that questions will cause surprise or distress (especially for certain groups of women), the belief that sexual problems are to be expected as women age, and the belief that FSD is complex or untreatable, with unclear management pathways. Exploratory findings indicated significant differences in men and women's responses (men disagreed more strongly with prioritisation, and fewer reported routine inquiry about sexual problems in their usual practice).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>HCPs reported not asking women with diabetes about sexual problems during routine care. They described multiple factors reinforcing the silence about sexual health, including inadequate education and perceived social risk for individual HCPs who deviate from the patterns of topics usually discussed in diabetes consultations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.15370","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.15370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To explore UK healthcare professionals' practice and attitudes towards asking women with diabetes about sexual health problems, including symptoms of female sexual dysfunction (FSD).

Methods

An online questionnaire to address the study aims was developed, piloted by ten healthcare professionals (HCPs) and completed by 111 eligible HCPs, recruited via professional networks and social media. Free text data were analysed and reported thematically. Two questions were analysed to test the hypothesis of differences between men's and women's responses.

Results

The majority of respondents did not ask women with diabetes about sexual problems. Multiple barriers to inquiry were reported, including inadequate training, time constraints, competing priorities, the perceived likelihood that questions will cause surprise or distress (especially for certain groups of women), the belief that sexual problems are to be expected as women age, and the belief that FSD is complex or untreatable, with unclear management pathways. Exploratory findings indicated significant differences in men and women's responses (men disagreed more strongly with prioritisation, and fewer reported routine inquiry about sexual problems in their usual practice).

Conclusions

HCPs reported not asking women with diabetes about sexual problems during routine care. They described multiple factors reinforcing the silence about sexual health, including inadequate education and perceived social risk for individual HCPs who deviate from the patterns of topics usually discussed in diabetes consultations.

向女性糖尿病患者询问性问题:对国家医疗服务体系专业人员的态度和做法的探索性研究:对医疗保健专业人员进行的一项调查,内容涉及在对女性糖尿病患者进行常规护理时,有关性问题的沟通和沉默。
目的:探讨英国医疗保健专业人员向女性糖尿病患者询问性健康问题(包括女性性功能障碍 (FSD) 症状)的做法和态度:方法: 针对研究目的开发了一份在线调查问卷,由 10 名医疗保健专业人员 (HCP) 进行试点,并由通过专业网络和社交媒体招募的 111 名符合条件的医疗保健专业人员填写。对自由文本数据进行了分析,并按主题进行了报告。对两个问题进行了分析,以检验男女回答差异的假设:结果:大多数受访者没有询问女性糖尿病患者的性问题。据报告,调查存在多种障碍,包括培训不足、时间限制、优先事项相互竞争、认为问题可能会引起惊讶或困扰(尤其是对某些女性群体而言)、认为随着女性年龄的增长,性问题是意料之中的,以及认为 FSD 很复杂或无法治疗,管理途径不明确。探索性研究结果表明,男性和女性的回答存在明显差异(男性更不同意优先考虑性问题,较少报告在其日常工作中例行询问性问题):结论:保健医生表示在日常护理中没有询问女性糖尿病患者的性问题。他们描述了导致对性健康保持沉默的多种因素,包括教育不足以及个别保健医生认为偏离糖尿病咨询中通常讨论的话题模式会带来社会风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信