Twitter should now be referred to as X: How academics, journals and publishers need to make the nomenclatural transition

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets
{"title":"Twitter should now be referred to as X: How academics, journals and publishers need to make the nomenclatural transition","authors":"Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets","doi":"arxiv-2405.20670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, we note how academics, journals and publishers should no longer refer\nto the social media platform Twitter as such, rather as X. Relying on Google\nScholar, we found 16 examples of papers published in the last months of 2023 -\nessentially during the transition period between Twitter and X - that used\nTwitter and X, but in different ways. Unlike that transition period in which\nthe binary Twitter/X could have been used in academic papers, we suggest that\npapers should no longer refer to Twitter as Twitter, but only as X, except for\nhistorical studies about that social media platform, because such use would be\nfactually incorrect.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.20670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here, we note how academics, journals and publishers should no longer refer to the social media platform Twitter as such, rather as X. Relying on Google Scholar, we found 16 examples of papers published in the last months of 2023 - essentially during the transition period between Twitter and X - that used Twitter and X, but in different ways. Unlike that transition period in which the binary Twitter/X could have been used in academic papers, we suggest that papers should no longer refer to Twitter as Twitter, but only as X, except for historical studies about that social media platform, because such use would be factually incorrect.
Twitter 现在应被称为 X:学术界、期刊和出版商需要如何进行命名过渡
在此,我们指出学术界、期刊和出版商不应再将社交媒体平台Twitter称为Twitter,而应称为X。通过谷歌学术搜索(GoogleScholar),我们找到了16篇发表于2023年最后几个月的论文,这些论文基本上都是在Twitter和X之间的过渡时期发表的,但以不同的方式使用了Twitter和X。与学术论文中可以使用Twitter/X二进制的过渡时期不同,我们建议,除了有关该社交媒体平台的历史研究外,论文不应再将Twitter称为Twitter,而只应称为X,因为这种用法实际上是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信