Gingival health, plaque accumulation, and restoration outcomes in deciduous anterior teeth: evaluating zirconia crowns versus composite resin strip crowns.

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Sunil K Vaddamanu, Bhavana T Veerabasavaiah, Abdulkhaliq A Alshadidi, Fahad H Alhamoudi, Ravinder S Saini, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini
{"title":"Gingival health, plaque accumulation, and restoration outcomes in deciduous anterior teeth: evaluating zirconia crowns versus composite resin strip crowns.","authors":"Sunil K Vaddamanu, Bhavana T Veerabasavaiah, Abdulkhaliq A Alshadidi, Fahad H Alhamoudi, Ravinder S Saini, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07459-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zirconia crowns, resembling crystals and with enamel-like aesthetics, are recent entrants in pediatric restorative dentistry. Despite growing use, their empirical efficacy remains under-explored. The aim of this study is to compare resin composite strip crowns and premanufactured zirconia crowns on primary maxillary incisors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Pediatric Dental Clinics, 240 primary maxillary incisors (69 patients) were treated with either zirconia (120 teeth) or composite strip crowns (120 teeth). Evaluations of gingival health, plaque, secondary caries, restoration failure, and opposing teeth wear occurred at 3, 6, and 12-month intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months, zirconia crowns showed less gum bleeding (P=0.006) and plaque. Through 6 and 12 months, zirconia crowns exhibited fewer failures but higher opposing teeth wear. Strip crowns indicated greater tooth material loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zirconia crowns demonstrated superior gingival health and durability over composite resin strip crowns but caused increased wear on opposing teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07459-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Zirconia crowns, resembling crystals and with enamel-like aesthetics, are recent entrants in pediatric restorative dentistry. Despite growing use, their empirical efficacy remains under-explored. The aim of this study is to compare resin composite strip crowns and premanufactured zirconia crowns on primary maxillary incisors.

Methods: In the Pediatric Dental Clinics, 240 primary maxillary incisors (69 patients) were treated with either zirconia (120 teeth) or composite strip crowns (120 teeth). Evaluations of gingival health, plaque, secondary caries, restoration failure, and opposing teeth wear occurred at 3, 6, and 12-month intervals.

Results: At 3 months, zirconia crowns showed less gum bleeding (P=0.006) and plaque. Through 6 and 12 months, zirconia crowns exhibited fewer failures but higher opposing teeth wear. Strip crowns indicated greater tooth material loss.

Conclusions: Zirconia crowns demonstrated superior gingival health and durability over composite resin strip crowns but caused increased wear on opposing teeth.

落叶前牙的牙龈健康、菌斑积累和修复效果:氧化锆冠与复合树脂条形冠的对比评估。
背景:氧化锆牙冠形似水晶,具有类似珐琅质的美感,是最近才进入儿童牙科修复领域的。尽管其应用越来越广泛,但其经验疗效仍未得到充分探索。本研究的目的是比较树脂复合材料条状冠和预制氧化锆冠对上颌原切牙的效果:方法:在儿童牙科诊所,对 240 颗上颌原切牙(69 名患者)进行了氧化锆冠(120 颗)或复合材料条状冠(120 颗)治疗。每隔 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月对牙龈健康、牙菌斑、继发龋、修复失败和对齿磨损进行评估:结果:3 个月时,氧化锆牙冠的牙龈出血(P=0.006)和牙菌斑较少。在 6 个月和 12 个月期间,氧化锆牙冠的失败率较低,但对牙磨损率较高。剥离冠的牙齿材料损耗较大:结论:氧化锆牙冠的牙龈健康和耐久性优于复合树脂条状牙冠,但会增加对颌牙的磨损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信