Dietary acid load and risk of diminished ovarian reserve: a case-control study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Rahele Ziaei, Abed Ghavami, Hatav Ghasemi-Tehrani, Minoo Movahedi, Maryam Hashemi, Maryam Hajhashemi, Mahshid Elyasi, Mahdi Vajdi, Maryam Kalatehjari
{"title":"Dietary acid load and risk of diminished ovarian reserve: a case-control study.","authors":"Rahele Ziaei, Abed Ghavami, Hatav Ghasemi-Tehrani, Minoo Movahedi, Maryam Hashemi, Maryam Hajhashemi, Mahshid Elyasi, Mahdi Vajdi, Maryam Kalatehjari","doi":"10.1186/s12958-024-01238-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The epidemiologic evidence on the association between acid load potential of diet and the risk of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is scarce. We aim to explore the possible relationship between dietary acid load (DAL), markers of ovarian reserve and DOR risk in a case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>370 women (120 women with DOR and 250 women with normal ovarian reserve as controls), matched by age and BMI, were recruited. Dietary intake was obtained using a validated 80-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The DAL scores including the potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) were calculated based on nutrients intake. NEAP and PRAL scores were categorized by quartiles based on the distribution of controls. Antral follicle count (AFC), serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) and anthropometric indices were measured. Logistic regression models were used to estimate multivariable odds ratio (OR) of DOR across quartiles of NEAP and PRAL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following increase in PRAL and NEAP scores, serum AMH significantly decreased in women with DOR. Also, AFC count had a significant decrease following increase in PRAL score (P = 0.045). After adjustment for multiple confounding variables, participants in the top quartile of PRAL had increased OR for DOR (OR: 1.26; 95%CI: 1.08-1.42, P = 0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diets with high acid-forming potential may negatively affect ovarian reserve in women with DOR. Also, high DAL may increase the risk of DOR. The association between DAL and markers of ovarian reserve should be explored in prospective studies and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":"22 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01238-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The epidemiologic evidence on the association between acid load potential of diet and the risk of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is scarce. We aim to explore the possible relationship between dietary acid load (DAL), markers of ovarian reserve and DOR risk in a case-control study.

Methods: 370 women (120 women with DOR and 250 women with normal ovarian reserve as controls), matched by age and BMI, were recruited. Dietary intake was obtained using a validated 80-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The DAL scores including the potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) were calculated based on nutrients intake. NEAP and PRAL scores were categorized by quartiles based on the distribution of controls. Antral follicle count (AFC), serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) and anthropometric indices were measured. Logistic regression models were used to estimate multivariable odds ratio (OR) of DOR across quartiles of NEAP and PRAL scores.

Results: Following increase in PRAL and NEAP scores, serum AMH significantly decreased in women with DOR. Also, AFC count had a significant decrease following increase in PRAL score (P = 0.045). After adjustment for multiple confounding variables, participants in the top quartile of PRAL had increased OR for DOR (OR: 1.26; 95%CI: 1.08-1.42, P = 0.254).

Conclusion: Diets with high acid-forming potential may negatively affect ovarian reserve in women with DOR. Also, high DAL may increase the risk of DOR. The association between DAL and markers of ovarian reserve should be explored in prospective studies and clinical trials.

膳食酸负荷与卵巢储备功能减退的风险:一项病例对照研究。
背景:有关膳食酸负荷潜力与卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)风险之间关系的流行病学证据很少。我们旨在通过一项病例对照研究探讨膳食酸负荷(DAL)、卵巢储备标志物和 DOR 风险之间可能存在的关系。方法:我们招募了 370 名年龄和体重指数相匹配的女性(120 名 DOR 女性和 250 名卵巢储备正常的女性作为对照)。膳食摄入量通过有效的 80 项半定量食物频率问卷调查(FFQ)获得。根据营养摄入量计算出 DAL 分数,包括潜在肾酸负荷(PRAL)和内源性净产酸(NEAP)。根据对照组的分布情况,将 NEAP 和 PRAL 分数按四分位数分类。测量了前卵泡计数(AFC)、血清抗苗勒氏管激素(AMH)和人体测量指数。使用逻辑回归模型估算了不同NEAP和PRAL评分四分位数的DOR的多变量几率比(OR):结果:随着 PRAL 和 NEAP 分数的增加,DOR 妇女的血清 AMH 显著下降。此外,PRAL 评分增加后,AFC 计数也明显下降(P = 0.045)。在对多种混杂变量进行调整后,PRAL最高四分位数的参与者的DOR发生率增加(OR:1.26;95%CI:1.08-1.42,P = 0.254):结论:高制酸潜能饮食可能会对患有 DOR 的妇女的卵巢储备功能产生负面影响。此外,高 DAL 可能会增加 DOR 的风险。应在前瞻性研究和临床试验中探讨 DAL 与卵巢储备指标之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信