The inclusion of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in smoke-free home and car rules: A cross-sectional survey of adults in Armenia and Georgia.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2024-06-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/189200

Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Arevik Torosyan, Ana Dekanosidze, Lilit Grigoryan, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Lela Sturua, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander Bazarchyan, Regine Haardörfer, Yuxian Cui, Carla J Berg

{"title":"The inclusion of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in smoke-free home and car rules: A cross-sectional survey of adults in Armenia and Georgia.","authors":"Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Arevik Torosyan, Ana Dekanosidze, Lilit Grigoryan, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Lela Sturua, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander Bazarchyan, Regine Haardörfer, Yuxian Cui, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.18332/tid/189200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Understanding who includes e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) in smoke-free home or car rules could inform public health interventions, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence and recently implemented national smoke-free laws, like Armenia and Georgia.Methods: In 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 1468 adults in 28 Armenian and Georgian communities (mean age=42.92 years; 51.4% female, 31.6% past-month smoking). Multilevel regression (accounting for clustering within communities; adjusted for sociodemographics and cigarette use) examined e-cigarette/HTP perceptions (risk, social acceptability) and use intentions in relation to: 1) including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home and car rules among participants with home and car rules, respectively (logistic regressions); and 2) intention to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (linear regression, 1 = 'not at all' to 7 = 'extremely') among those without home rules.Results: Overall, 72.9% (n=1070) had home rules, 86.5% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs; 33.9% (n=498) had car rules, 81.3% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs. Greater perceived e-cigarette/HTP risk was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50) and car rules (AOR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.14-1.87) and next-year intentions to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.25-0.50). Lower e-cigarette/HTP use intentions were associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.88). While perceived social acceptability was unassociated with the outcomes, other social influences were: having children and no other household smokers was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in car rules, and having children was associated with intent to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules.Conclusions: Interventions to address gaps in home and car rules might target e-cigarette/HTP risk perceptions.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/189200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding who includes e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) in smoke-free home or car rules could inform public health interventions, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence and recently implemented national smoke-free laws, like Armenia and Georgia.

Methods: In 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 1468 adults in 28 Armenian and Georgian communities (mean age=42.92 years; 51.4% female, 31.6% past-month smoking). Multilevel regression (accounting for clustering within communities; adjusted for sociodemographics and cigarette use) examined e-cigarette/HTP perceptions (risk, social acceptability) and use intentions in relation to: 1) including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home and car rules among participants with home and car rules, respectively (logistic regressions); and 2) intention to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (linear regression, 1 = 'not at all' to 7 = 'extremely') among those without home rules.

Results: Overall, 72.9% (n=1070) had home rules, 86.5% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs; 33.9% (n=498) had car rules, 81.3% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs. Greater perceived e-cigarette/HTP risk was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50) and car rules (AOR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.14-1.87) and next-year intentions to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.25-0.50). Lower e-cigarette/HTP use intentions were associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.88). While perceived social acceptability was unassociated with the outcomes, other social influences were: having children and no other household smokers was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in car rules, and having children was associated with intent to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules.

Conclusions: Interventions to address gaps in home and car rules might target e-cigarette/HTP risk perceptions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将电子烟和加热烟草制品纳入家庭和汽车无烟规定：对亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人的横断面调查。

导言：了解哪些人将电子烟和加热烟草制品（HTPs）纳入了家庭或汽车无烟规定，可以为公共卫生干预提供信息，特别是在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚等吸烟率较高且最近实施了国家无烟法律的国家：2022 年，我们对亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚 28 个社区的 1468 名成年人（平均年龄=42.92 岁；51.4% 为女性，31.6% 过去一个月吸烟）进行了横断面调查。多层次回归（考虑了社区内的聚类；根据社会人口统计学和吸烟情况进行了调整）研究了电子烟/HTP 的认知（风险、社会接受度）和使用意向与以下方面的关系：1）包括电子烟在内的电子烟的使用意向：1) 在有家规和车规的参与者中分别将电子烟/HTP 纳入家规和车规（逻辑回归）；以及 2) 在无家规的参与者中将电子烟/HTP 纳入家规的意向（线性回归，1 ="完全没有 "到 7 ="非常有"）：总体而言，72.9%（人数=1070）的人有家规，其中86.5%包括电子烟/HTPs；33.9%（人数=498）的人有车规，其中81.3%包括电子烟/HTPs。更高的电子烟/HTP 风险感知与将电子烟/HTP 纳入家规（AOR=1.28；95% CI：1.08-1.50）和车规（AOR=1.46；95% CI：1.14-1.87）以及下一年将电子烟/HTP 纳入家规的意愿相关（β=0.38；95% CI：0.25-0.50）。较低的电子烟/HTP 使用意愿与将电子烟/HTP 纳入家庭规则有关（AOR=0.75；95% CI：0.63-0.88）。虽然感知到的社会可接受性与结果无关，但其他社会影响因素却与结果有关：有孩子且家中无其他吸烟者与将电子烟/HTP纳入车规有关，有孩子与将电子烟/HTP纳入家规的意向有关：结论：针对电子烟/HTP 风险认知的干预措施可以弥补家庭和汽车规则的不足。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

5.40%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.