Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tetsuya Amano , Nobuhide Agata , Takeshi Yamamoto , Keisuke Mori
{"title":"Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application","authors":"Tetsuya Amano ,&nbsp;Nobuhide Agata ,&nbsp;Takeshi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Keisuke Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland–Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland–Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC<sub>95</sub> values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland–Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.

Results

The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland–Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC95) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC95 values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.

Conclusion

IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.

使用智能手机应用软件对健康年轻人进行直腿抬高和髋关节伸展运动范围测试的可靠性
导言测量运动范围(ROM)是临床医生的一项重要技能,因为它有助于准确解释患者的病情。最近,在临床环境中使用智能手机应用程序进行了ROM测试,这些测试显示出较高的可靠性和有效性。本研究旨在通过检测直腿抬高(SLR)和髋关节伸展(HE)测试的可靠性,确定使用智能手机应用程序进行 ROM 测试的实用性。使用 iPhone 动态关节角度计 (IG) 以 1° 为增量测量被动 SLR-ROM 和 HE-ROM。使用类内相关系数(ICC)计算评分者内部和评分者之间的信度。使用Bland-Altman分析确认了ROM测试的系统误差,并计算了ROM测量误差。根据Bland-Altman分析,SLR-ROM和HE-ROM不存在固定偏差和比例偏差。因此,ROM测量误差被计算为最小可检测变化(MDC)。SLR-ROM的评分者内和评分者间MDC 95%置信区间(MDC95)值分别为3.3°和10.2°。结论IG ROM测试高度可靠、简单且易于操作。使用智能手机应用程序进行的SLR-ROM和HE-ROM测试可能是临床决策的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信