Rasch analysis of the self efficacy (SE-12) questionnaire measuring clinical communication skills

Kaj Sparle Christensen , Jette Ammentorp
{"title":"Rasch analysis of the self efficacy (SE-12) questionnaire measuring clinical communication skills","authors":"Kaj Sparle Christensen ,&nbsp;Jette Ammentorp","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the construct validity and reliability of the Self Efficacy (SE-12) questionnaire using Rasch analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The SE-12 was administered to Danish health care professionals prior to their participation in a communication skills training program. Analysis of fit to the Rasch model, ordering of response categories, dimensionality-testing, test for differential item functioning, test for local dependency, and calculation of reliability were used to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the SE-12.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study, 1057 respondents were analyzed. Overall, the SE-12 demonstrated an acceptable fit to the Rasch model. Response categories were appropriately ordered for all twelve items. However, items 6 (structure) and item 8 (empathy) demonstrated differential item functioning, with men being more likely to affirm the first and women the last item. Local dependency was observed between five item groups but adjusting for these improved fit indices significantly. The SE-12 exhibited high reliability with PSI ranging from 0.92 to 0.94. A transformation table converting ordinal scores to interval scores is provided.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SE-12 demonstrates good construct validity and excellent reliability. Minor issues regarding local dependency and differential functioning require attention.</p><p>Innovation: A 5-item version could be explored without compromising validity and reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277262822400044X/pdfft?md5=f716c471ab858baec766b246cc80f174&pid=1-s2.0-S277262822400044X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277262822400044X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the construct validity and reliability of the Self Efficacy (SE-12) questionnaire using Rasch analysis.

Methods

The SE-12 was administered to Danish health care professionals prior to their participation in a communication skills training program. Analysis of fit to the Rasch model, ordering of response categories, dimensionality-testing, test for differential item functioning, test for local dependency, and calculation of reliability were used to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the SE-12.

Results

In this study, 1057 respondents were analyzed. Overall, the SE-12 demonstrated an acceptable fit to the Rasch model. Response categories were appropriately ordered for all twelve items. However, items 6 (structure) and item 8 (empathy) demonstrated differential item functioning, with men being more likely to affirm the first and women the last item. Local dependency was observed between five item groups but adjusting for these improved fit indices significantly. The SE-12 exhibited high reliability with PSI ranging from 0.92 to 0.94. A transformation table converting ordinal scores to interval scores is provided.

Conclusion

The SE-12 demonstrates good construct validity and excellent reliability. Minor issues regarding local dependency and differential functioning require attention.

Innovation: A 5-item version could be explored without compromising validity and reliability.

测量临床沟通技能的自我效能(SE-12)问卷的 Rasch 分析
方法 在丹麦医护人员参加沟通技巧培训项目之前,对他们进行了自我效能(SE-12)问卷调查。采用拉施模型拟合分析、反应类别排序、维度测试、差异项目功能测试、局部依赖性测试和信度计算等方法来评估 SE-12 的心理测量学特征。总体而言,SE-12 与 Rasch 模型的拟合程度可以接受。所有 12 个项目的回答类别都进行了适当的排序。但是,项目 6(结构)和项目 8(移情)显示出不同的项目功能,男性更倾向于肯定第一个项目,而女性更倾向于肯定最后一个项目。五个项目组之间存在局部依赖性,但对这些依赖性进行调整后,拟合指数得到了显著改善。SE-12 显示出较高的可靠性,PSI 在 0.92 至 0.94 之间。结论SE-12具有良好的建构效度和出色的信度。需要注意有关局部依赖性和功能差异的小问题:创新:在不影响效度和信度的情况下,可以探索 5 个项目的版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信