A MCDM-based measurement proposal of job satisfaction comprising psychosocial risks.

IF 2 3区工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2361301

Irem Sarbat

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preserving human well-being has become challenging for businesses, which continue efforts to overcome managing business processes concurrently, due to the cumulative effects of psychosocial risks at work that may seriously impair one's health. By focusing on this need, this paper proposes a more effective and realistic way of measuring job satisfaction comprising psychosocial risks by integrating multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology. Simplified PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA-S), i.e. the selected MCDM method, is used for weighting domains based on the opinions of employees working for a company in Türkiye, who also provide their attitudes towards job satisfaction through 36 items of Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS). This paper uses nine subscales of JSS to represent domains relevant to psychosocial risks. Three developed scenarios discuss the effectiveness of the proposed subscale-weighted job satisfaction measurement by presenting the subscales having different ranges in standard scores relative to the subscale-weighted scores.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于 MCDM 的包含社会心理风险的工作满意度测量建议。

由于工作中的社会心理风险可能会严重损害人的健康，其累积效应使企业不断努力克服同时管理业务流程的问题，因此维护人的福祉已成为企业面临的挑战。针对这一需求，本文通过整合多标准决策（MCDM）方法，提出了一种更有效、更现实的方法来衡量包含社会心理风险的工作满意度。本文采用简化 PIvot 配对相对标准重要性评估（PIPRECIA-S），即选定的 MCDM 方法，根据在土耳其一家公司工作的员工的意见对各领域进行加权，这些员工还通过工作满意度调查（JSS）的 36 个项目提供了他们对工作满意度的态度。本文使用工作满意度调查的九个分量表来代表与社会心理风险相关的领域。通过展示相对于子量表加权分数具有不同标准分数范围的子量表，三个开发的情景讨论了所建议的子量表加权工作满意度测量的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ergonomics 工程技术-工程：工业

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.