Measure to improve: a pilot study of Birthrate Plus in the Netherlands

Q2 Nursing
Doug Cronie, Ageeth Rosman, Raymond de Vries
{"title":"Measure to improve: a pilot study of Birthrate Plus in the Netherlands","authors":"Doug Cronie, Ageeth Rosman, Raymond de Vries","doi":"10.12968/bjom.2024.32.6.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based standards are an important means for ensuring safe and effective care for birthing women. The provision of one-to-one care for women in labour is one such standard, which should be the norm in Dutch maternity care. However, no audit measures of this standard are available. This study examined the use of Birthrate Plus, a validated instrument for the measurement of patient acuity. This tool has the added benefit of allowing measurement of birth characteristics in relation to staffing numbers, providing a basis for auditing the standard of one-to-one care for women in labour in hospitals in the Netherlands. This pilot study used the Birthrate Plus tool to retrospectively examine birth characteristics and staffing levels in a 4-month period, in five hospitals in the Netherlands. The review of 11 582 patient cases found that most births in the sample were classified as occurring in the higher acuity levels of Birthrate+ tool. Examination of staffing levels showed that when comparing actual staffing levels with recommended levels, hospitals had a shortfall of between 47% and 64%. The Birthrate Plus tool could be useful in auditing staffing levels in Dutch maternity care. Analysis of the data provided by hospitals in the sample showed that none were able to meet the Dutch standard of providing consistent one-one-one care.","PeriodicalId":52489,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.32.6.302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based standards are an important means for ensuring safe and effective care for birthing women. The provision of one-to-one care for women in labour is one such standard, which should be the norm in Dutch maternity care. However, no audit measures of this standard are available. This study examined the use of Birthrate Plus, a validated instrument for the measurement of patient acuity. This tool has the added benefit of allowing measurement of birth characteristics in relation to staffing numbers, providing a basis for auditing the standard of one-to-one care for women in labour in hospitals in the Netherlands. This pilot study used the Birthrate Plus tool to retrospectively examine birth characteristics and staffing levels in a 4-month period, in five hospitals in the Netherlands. The review of 11 582 patient cases found that most births in the sample were classified as occurring in the higher acuity levels of Birthrate+ tool. Examination of staffing levels showed that when comparing actual staffing levels with recommended levels, hospitals had a shortfall of between 47% and 64%. The Birthrate Plus tool could be useful in auditing staffing levels in Dutch maternity care. Analysis of the data provided by hospitals in the sample showed that none were able to meet the Dutch standard of providing consistent one-one-one care.
改进措施:荷兰 "出生率提高 "试点研究
以证据为基础的标准是确保为分娩妇女提供安全有效护理的重要手段。为产妇提供一对一护理就是这样一种标准,它应该成为荷兰产妇护理的规范。然而,目前还没有针对这一标准的审计措施。这项研究考察了 "Birthrate Plus "的使用情况。该工具的另一个好处是可以测量与人员数量相关的分娩特征,从而为审核荷兰医院为产妇提供一对一护理的标准提供依据。这项试点研究利用出生率 Plus 工具,对荷兰五家医院为期四个月的分娩特征和人员配置水平进行了回顾性研究。在对 11 582 例病人进行审查后发现,样本中的大多数分娩都被归类为 "出生率+"工具中的高危级分娩。对人员配备水平的研究表明,将实际人员配备水平与建议水平相比,医院的人员配备缺口在 47% 至 64% 之间。出生率+工具可用于审核荷兰产科护理中的人员配备水平。对样本医院提供的数据进行分析后发现,没有一家医院能够达到荷兰的标准,即提供始终如一的一对一护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Midwifery
British Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Midwifery (BJM) is the leading clinical journal for midwives. Published each month, the journal is written by midwives for midwives and peer reviewed by some of the foremost authorities in the profession. BJM is essential reading for all midwives. It contains the best clinical reviews, original research and evidence-based articles available, and ensures that midwives are kept fully up-to-date with the latest developments taking place in clinical practice. In addition, each issue of the journal contains a symposium on a particular theme, providing more in-depth clinical information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信