On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and „Success”– Biologically

Linda Hutcheon, G. Bortolotti
{"title":"On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and „Success”– Biologically","authors":"Linda Hutcheon, G. Bortolotti","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like the early evolutionary theory (though unlike Darwin’s own output), much work in literary\nadaptation today operates only in terms of higher and lower forms, considering adaptations\nas more or less „faithful” to the „original”. In biology, it was only when this sort of evaluative discourse\nwas discarded that new questions could be asked and therefore new answers offered. To that\nend, a biologist and a literary theorist work to develop the homology between biological and cultural\nadaptation, between natural and cultural selection: stories, in a manner parallel to genes, replicate;\nadaptations of both evolve with changing environments. Their „success” cannot and should\nnot, in either case, be limited to their degree of „fidelity” to anything called a „source” or „original”.\n\n","PeriodicalId":515211,"journal":{"name":"Tekstualia","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekstualia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like the early evolutionary theory (though unlike Darwin’s own output), much work in literary adaptation today operates only in terms of higher and lower forms, considering adaptations as more or less „faithful” to the „original”. In biology, it was only when this sort of evaluative discourse was discarded that new questions could be asked and therefore new answers offered. To that end, a biologist and a literary theorist work to develop the homology between biological and cultural adaptation, between natural and cultural selection: stories, in a manner parallel to genes, replicate; adaptations of both evolve with changing environments. Their „success” cannot and should not, in either case, be limited to their degree of „fidelity” to anything called a „source” or „original”.
关于适应的起源:重新思考忠实性论述和 "成功"--从生物学角度
与早期的进化论一样(尽管与达尔文本人的成果不同),今天的许多文学改编工作也只是从高级和低级形式的角度进行,认为改编或多或少 "忠实 "于 "原作"。在生物学中,只有摒弃了这种评价话语,才能提出新的问题,从而提供新的答案。为此,一位生物学家和一位文学理论家致力于发展生物适应与文化适应、自然选择与文化选择之间的同源性:故事以一种与基因相似的方式复制;两者的适应都随着环境的变化而进化。在这两种情况下,它们的 "成功 "不能也不应该局限于对所谓 "来源 "或 "原创 "的 "忠实 "程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信