Exploring the utility of process scores in elucidating the role of cognitive and affective factors that influence verbal fluency performance in Parkinson's disease.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Catie J Wandell, Karen Torres
{"title":"Exploring the utility of process scores in elucidating the role of cognitive and affective factors that influence verbal fluency performance in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Catie J Wandell, Karen Torres","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional (\"core\") and \"process\" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (<i>p</i> = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (<i>p</i> = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (<i>p</i> = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (<i>b</i> = -.055, <i>p</i> = .028; <i>b</i> = -.062, <i>p</i> = .004) and final 45-second interval (<i>b</i> = -.072, <i>p</i> = .003; <i>b</i> = -.044, <i>p</i> = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (<i>b</i> = .616, <i>p</i> = .044) was demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings demonstrate the potential utility of \"process\" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional ("core") and "process" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.

Methods: Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.

Results: Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (p = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (p = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (p = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (b = -.055, p = .028; b = -.062, p = .004) and final 45-second interval (b = -.072, p = .003; b = -.044, p = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (b = .616, p = .044) was demonstrated.

Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the potential utility of "process" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.

探索过程评分在阐明影响帕金森病患者言语流畅性的认知和情感因素方面的作用。
目的:帕金森病(PD)患者的言语流畅性(VF)表现与认知和情感因素有关。这项探索性研究旨在调查认知和情感变量与言语流畅性的传统("核心")和 "过程"(错误和间隔)得分之间的关系,并阐明这些得分可能提供的有关言语流畅性潜在机制的独特信息:62名无痴呆症的帕金森病患者完成了临床神经心理学检查,包括注意力、处理速度、语言、执行功能、视觉空间、记忆和情绪测量。分层回归和负二项回归分析用于评估结果与预测变量之间的关系:生成性结果显示,处理速度和工作记忆最多可解释 34% 的总字母流利性反应变异(p = p = .003)。在类别转换生成性方面,只有年龄能预测 20% 的变异(p = .01)。在类别转换任务的持续时间(b = -.055,p = .028;b = -.062,p = .004)和最后 45 秒间隔(b = -.072,p = .003;b = -.044,p = .033)内,两项执行功能测量与错误产生呈负相关。在最初的 15 秒任务间隔中,错误产生与冷漠冷淡之间存在正向预测关系(b = .616,p = .044):研究结果证明了 "过程 "评分在检测无痴呆症的帕金森病患者细微认知障碍方面的潜在作用,并初步证明了冷漠淡漠在任务启动中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信