Homo Poeta: Rowan Williams and Poetic Anthropology

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Modern Theology Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1111/moth.12950
Patrick John McGlinchey
{"title":"Homo Poeta: Rowan Williams and Poetic Anthropology","authors":"Patrick John McGlinchey","doi":"10.1111/moth.12950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rowan Williams's trinitarian ontology rests on the affirmation of <jats:italic>eros</jats:italic> within God and the ‘irreducible otherness’ of the divine persons to one another. The divine persons are accordingly conceived in <jats:italic>ek‐static</jats:italic> terms as ‘giving more than they are’. In the generation of the Son and the spiration of the Spirit we discern the ‘timeless making other that is intrinsic to God's being’. It is this poetics from above that is the ‘fountainhead’ of finite human creativity on Williams's view, and more specifically, the eternal filial reality of the Son as the Art, Image or Sign of the Father. Conversely, his poetics from below begins with a phenomenology of artistic labour and linguistic practice that is acutely alert to the material and temporalized conditions of human making. In this article, I elaborate and defend the coordination and mutual illumination provided by his poetics from above and from below which affects a significant reworking of how we imagine the relation between the finite and the infinite. What emerges from this re‐working, I will argue, is a profound, ecstatic and ‘personalist’ view of the material and temporal human creature becoming ‘hypostatic’ via a <jats:italic>filial</jats:italic> mode of creativity.","PeriodicalId":18945,"journal":{"name":"Modern Theology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rowan Williams's trinitarian ontology rests on the affirmation of eros within God and the ‘irreducible otherness’ of the divine persons to one another. The divine persons are accordingly conceived in ek‐static terms as ‘giving more than they are’. In the generation of the Son and the spiration of the Spirit we discern the ‘timeless making other that is intrinsic to God's being’. It is this poetics from above that is the ‘fountainhead’ of finite human creativity on Williams's view, and more specifically, the eternal filial reality of the Son as the Art, Image or Sign of the Father. Conversely, his poetics from below begins with a phenomenology of artistic labour and linguistic practice that is acutely alert to the material and temporalized conditions of human making. In this article, I elaborate and defend the coordination and mutual illumination provided by his poetics from above and from below which affects a significant reworking of how we imagine the relation between the finite and the infinite. What emerges from this re‐working, I will argue, is a profound, ecstatic and ‘personalist’ view of the material and temporal human creature becoming ‘hypostatic’ via a filial mode of creativity.
Homo Poeta:罗文-威廉斯与诗意人类学
罗文-威廉斯的三位一体本体论基于对上帝内在情欲的肯定以及神性之间 "不可还原的他者性"。因此,神性被认为是 "给予多于自身 "的 "静态"。在圣子的生成和圣灵的喷发中,我们看到了'永恒的创造他者,这是上帝存在的内在本质'。在威廉斯看来,这种自上而下的诗学才是人类有限创造力的 "源泉",更确切地说,是圣子作为天父的艺术、形象或标志的永恒孝道现实。相反,他的自下而上的诗学则从艺术劳动和语言实践的现象学入手,对人类创造的物质和时间条件保持着敏锐的警觉。在这篇文章中,我阐述并捍卫了他的自上而下诗学所提供的协调和相互照亮,这种协调和相互照亮对我们如何想象有限与无限之间的关系产生了重大影响。我将论证,从这一重构中产生的是一种深刻的、狂喜的和 "个人主义 "的观点,即物质的和时间的人类造物通过一种孝顺的创造模式成为 "虚体"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Theology
Modern Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信