Validation of the German long and short versions of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Verena Wüllhorst, Julia Lützkendorf, Tanja Endrass
{"title":"Validation of the German long and short versions of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale","authors":"Verena Wüllhorst,&nbsp;Julia Lützkendorf,&nbsp;Tanja Endrass","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale is a widely used self-report measure of impulsivity, but there is currently no validated German version that includes the Positive Urgency scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We combined existing German translations of UPPS scales and included the Positive Urgency dimension to validate the UPPS-P in a sample of 399 participants. In addition, we developed a revised short version of the UPPS-P (SUPPS-P) with 20 items and conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the structure in an independent validation sample with 349 participants. To determine evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, we used measures of impulsivity, depression, anxiety, stress, problematic alcohol and substance use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>CFA of the five factorial structure of the UPPS-P demonstrated acceptable fits and evidence of validity and reliability for the subscales. Psychometric characteristics of the SUPPS-P using the original item configuration were not satisfactory. As a result, we developed a revised German version of the SUPPS-P and confirmed the five-factor structure using a CFA in the validation sample. For the revised version, model fits and evidence of validity and internal consistencies were good. Associations with other constructs were as expected. For example, whereas <i>Sensation Seeking</i> was associated moderately with problematic alcohol use, lacking associations of <i>Lack of Premeditation</i> to internalizing symptoms showed evidence of discriminant validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The German translations of both UPPS-P and SUPPS-P are valid tools for measuring impulsive behaviors. They are well-suited for exploring the associations between different facets of impulsivity and psychopathological phenomena.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 10","pages":"2099-2116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23724","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale is a widely used self-report measure of impulsivity, but there is currently no validated German version that includes the Positive Urgency scale.

Methods

We combined existing German translations of UPPS scales and included the Positive Urgency dimension to validate the UPPS-P in a sample of 399 participants. In addition, we developed a revised short version of the UPPS-P (SUPPS-P) with 20 items and conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the structure in an independent validation sample with 349 participants. To determine evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, we used measures of impulsivity, depression, anxiety, stress, problematic alcohol and substance use.

Results

CFA of the five factorial structure of the UPPS-P demonstrated acceptable fits and evidence of validity and reliability for the subscales. Psychometric characteristics of the SUPPS-P using the original item configuration were not satisfactory. As a result, we developed a revised German version of the SUPPS-P and confirmed the five-factor structure using a CFA in the validation sample. For the revised version, model fits and evidence of validity and internal consistencies were good. Associations with other constructs were as expected. For example, whereas Sensation Seeking was associated moderately with problematic alcohol use, lacking associations of Lack of Premeditation to internalizing symptoms showed evidence of discriminant validity.

Discussion

The German translations of both UPPS-P and SUPPS-P are valid tools for measuring impulsive behaviors. They are well-suited for exploring the associations between different facets of impulsivity and psychopathological phenomena.

Abstract Image

UPPS-P冲动行为量表德文长短版的验证。
目的UPPS-P冲动行为量表是一种广泛使用的冲动性自我报告测量方法,但目前还没有包含积极紧迫感量表的经过验证的德语版本:我们合并了现有的 UPPS 量表德文译本,并加入了积极紧迫感维度,在 399 名参与者样本中验证了 UPPS-P。此外,我们还编制了包含20个项目的UPPS-P修订简版(SUPPS-P),并在349名参与者的独立验证样本中进行了确证因子分析(CFA)以验证其结构。为了确定收敛效度和区分效度的证据,我们使用了冲动、抑郁、焦虑、压力、问题酒精和药物使用等测量指标:结果:UPPS-P的五因子结构的CFA显示了可接受的拟合度,并证明了各分量表的有效性和可靠性。使用原始项目配置的 SUPPS-P 心理测量特征并不令人满意。因此,我们开发了 SUPPS-P 的德文修订版,并在验证样本中使用 CFA 确认了五因子结构。修订版的模型拟合度、效度和内部一致性都很好。与其他构念之间的关联也符合预期。例如,"寻求感觉 "与问题性饮酒之间存在中度关联,而 "缺乏预谋 "与内化症状之间的关联则显示出了判别有效性:讨论:UPPS-P 和 SUPPS-P 的德文译本是测量冲动行为的有效工具。讨论:UPPS-P 和 SUPPS-P 的德文译本都是测量冲动行为的有效工具,非常适合用于探索冲动的不同方面与精神病理现象之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信