Increased Prevalence of Periapical Lesions in Osteoporosis Patients: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gabiana Rodrigues Freitas, Bárbara Luzia Capitanio, Theodoro Weissheimer, Bruna Barcelos Só, Emmanuel João Silva, Manoela Domingues Martins, Ricardo Abreu Da Rosa, Marcus Vinicius Reis So
{"title":"Increased Prevalence of Periapical Lesions in Osteoporosis Patients: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Gabiana Rodrigues Freitas, Bárbara Luzia Capitanio, Theodoro Weissheimer, Bruna Barcelos Só, Emmanuel João Silva, Manoela Domingues Martins, Ricardo Abreu Da Rosa, Marcus Vinicius Reis So","doi":"10.14744/eej.2024.98700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing scientific literature about prevalence of periapical lesions in individuals with osteoporosis in comparison to those without osteoporosis. Systematic searches were conducted up to November 24th, 2023 in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Grey Literature Reports databases. Only observational studies were included. The ROBINS-E tool, a revised Cochrane instrument for assessing bias in nonrandomized exposure studies, was employed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was utilized to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. From 484 studies, three were included. One of them was categorized as having an exceptionally high risk of bias, while two were deemed to have certain concerns. Two studies reported that osteoporotic patients may have more chances to present a periapical lesion compared to non-osteoporotic patients. One study reported no differences between groups. The GRADE analysis indicated a markedly low level of certainty in the evidence. The present review indicates that osteoporotic patients may present more periapical lesions compared to non-osteoporotic patients. This statement should be cautiously interpreted and further well-designed studies are needed. (EEJ-2023-09-123).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2024.98700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing scientific literature about prevalence of periapical lesions in individuals with osteoporosis in comparison to those without osteoporosis. Systematic searches were conducted up to November 24th, 2023 in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Grey Literature Reports databases. Only observational studies were included. The ROBINS-E tool, a revised Cochrane instrument for assessing bias in nonrandomized exposure studies, was employed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was utilized to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. From 484 studies, three were included. One of them was categorized as having an exceptionally high risk of bias, while two were deemed to have certain concerns. Two studies reported that osteoporotic patients may have more chances to present a periapical lesion compared to non-osteoporotic patients. One study reported no differences between groups. The GRADE analysis indicated a markedly low level of certainty in the evidence. The present review indicates that osteoporotic patients may present more periapical lesions compared to non-osteoporotic patients. This statement should be cautiously interpreted and further well-designed studies are needed. (EEJ-2023-09-123).

骨质疏松症患者根尖周病变患病率增加:系统回顾
评估有关骨质疏松症患者与非骨质疏松症患者根尖周病变患病率的科学文献。截至 2023 年 11 月 24 日,在 Cochrane Library、EMBASE、MEDLINE/PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 Grey Literature Reports 数据库中进行了系统检索。仅纳入观察性研究。采用了 ROBINS-E 工具,这是一种用于评估非随机暴露研究偏倚的 Cochrane 修订工具。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具来评估证据的确定性。在 484 项研究中,有三项被纳入。其中一项被归类为偏倚风险极高,另外两项被认为存在某些问题。两项研究报告称,与非骨质疏松患者相比,骨质疏松患者出现根尖周病变的几率可能更大。一项研究报告称各组之间没有差异。GRADE 分析显示证据的确定性明显较低。本综述表明,与非骨质疏松患者相比,骨质疏松患者可能会出现更多的根尖周病变。对这一结论应谨慎解读,需要进一步开展设计良好的研究。(EEJ-2023-09-123)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信