Emergency Medicine Physician Residents' Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Clinical Pharmacists' Involvement in Their Training.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Annals of Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1177/10600280241253383
Francisco Ibarra, Stacy Sawtelle, Mallory Cruz
{"title":"Emergency Medicine Physician Residents' Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Clinical Pharmacists' Involvement in Their Training.","authors":"Francisco Ibarra, Stacy Sawtelle, Mallory Cruz","doi":"10.1177/10600280241253383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the clinical impact of emergency medicine clinical pharmacists (EMCPs) on patient care outcomes is well documented, their educational impact on resident physicians' training is not.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To further highlight the utility of EMCPs, this study evaluated emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians' perceptions of EMCPs' involvement in their training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A voluntary, anonymous web-based survey was sent by email to all 44 EM resident physicians in July 2022. The survey included multiple choice, 5-point Likert scale, and free response questions derived from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pharmacotherapy competency-based milestones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six of the 44 (82%) residents completed the survey and all 10 PGY-4 class residents completed the survey. Nearly half of the respondents (44.4%) reported they consulted/interacted with the EMCPs 3 to 5 times per week and this number increased with the level of training. Respondents most often consulted the EMCPs to obtain medication indications, antibiotic dosing, pediatric dosing, and contraindications. Overall, respondents primarily reported strongly agree to all survey questions. Nearly all respondents strongly agreed the EMCPs are an important part of the patient care team and provide education that is different from what a supervising physician provides. All respondents who completed the pharmacy elective strongly agreed the elective was valuable and strongly recommended other residents to complete it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Respondents reported EMCPs are an important part of the patient care team, play a significant role in their training, and provide education that is different from what a supervising physician provides. Our findings encourage other institutions to leverage physicians' views of EMCPs to expand their service line.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241253383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the clinical impact of emergency medicine clinical pharmacists (EMCPs) on patient care outcomes is well documented, their educational impact on resident physicians' training is not.

Objective: To further highlight the utility of EMCPs, this study evaluated emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians' perceptions of EMCPs' involvement in their training.

Methods: A voluntary, anonymous web-based survey was sent by email to all 44 EM resident physicians in July 2022. The survey included multiple choice, 5-point Likert scale, and free response questions derived from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pharmacotherapy competency-based milestones.

Results: Thirty-six of the 44 (82%) residents completed the survey and all 10 PGY-4 class residents completed the survey. Nearly half of the respondents (44.4%) reported they consulted/interacted with the EMCPs 3 to 5 times per week and this number increased with the level of training. Respondents most often consulted the EMCPs to obtain medication indications, antibiotic dosing, pediatric dosing, and contraindications. Overall, respondents primarily reported strongly agree to all survey questions. Nearly all respondents strongly agreed the EMCPs are an important part of the patient care team and provide education that is different from what a supervising physician provides. All respondents who completed the pharmacy elective strongly agreed the elective was valuable and strongly recommended other residents to complete it.

Conclusion and relevance: Respondents reported EMCPs are an important part of the patient care team, play a significant role in their training, and provide education that is different from what a supervising physician provides. Our findings encourage other institutions to leverage physicians' views of EMCPs to expand their service line.

急诊科住院医生对急诊科临床药师参与其培训的看法。
背景:尽管急诊医学临床药剂师(EMCPs)对患者护理结果的临床影响已被充分记录,但他们对住院医师培训的教育影响尚未被充分记录:为了进一步突出 EMCPs 的作用,本研究评估了急诊医学住院医师对 EMCPs 参与其培训的看法:2022年7月,通过电子邮件向所有44名急诊科住院医生发送了一份自愿、匿名的网络调查。调查内容包括多选题、5 点李克特量表和自由回答问题,这些问题来自于美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会基于药物治疗能力的里程碑:44 位住院医师中有 36 位(82%)完成了调查,10 位 PGY-4 级住院医师全部完成了调查。近一半的受访者(44.4%)表示,他们每周向EMCP咨询/互动3至5次,这一数字随着培训级别的提高而增加。受访者最常向 EMCPs 咨询的问题包括药物适应症、抗生素剂量、儿科剂量和禁忌症。总体而言,受访者对所有调查问题均表示 "非常同意"。几乎所有受访者都非常同意 EMCP 是病人护理团队的重要组成部分,并提供与主管医生不同的教育。所有完成了药学选修课的受访者都非常认同选修课的价值,并强烈推荐其他住院医师完成选修课:受访者表示,EMCP 是患者护理团队的重要组成部分,在他们的培训中发挥着重要作用,并提供与指导医师不同的教育。我们的研究结果鼓励其他机构利用医生对EMCP的看法来扩大其服务范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信