[Structural health care reality in the surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s00120-024-02360-0
Viktoria Menzel, Ricarda M Bauer, Markus Grabbert, Juliane Putz, Nicole Eisenmenger, Luka Flegar, Angelika Borkowetz, Johannes Huber, Christian Thomas, Martin Baunacke
{"title":"[Structural health care reality in the surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany].","authors":"Viktoria Menzel, Ricarda M Bauer, Markus Grabbert, Juliane Putz, Nicole Eisenmenger, Luka Flegar, Angelika Borkowetz, Johannes Huber, Christian Thomas, Martin Baunacke","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02360-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence in men is predominantly iatrogenic after radical prostatectomy or transurethral interventions. Current studies show that there is a deficit in the availability of surgical therapy not only in Germany. The aim of this study is to investigate in more detail the structural health care situation of surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The evaluation of the surgical therapy of male stress incontinence in Germany is based on the OPS (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel-German procedural classification) codes from hospital quality reports from 2011-2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2012-2019, the number of male incontinence surgeries declined from 2191 to 1445. The number of departments performing incontinence surgeries decreased from 275 to 244. In the multivariate analysis, a high number (≥ 50) of radical prostatectomies/year (RPE/year) is an independent predictor of a high-volume centre (≥ 10 procedures/year; odds ratio [OR] 6.4 [2.3-17.6]; p < 0.001). The most significant decrease was in sling surgery (from 1091 to 410; p < 0.001). Here, the number of cases decreased especially in departments that implanted a high number of slings (≥ 10 slings/year; -69%; -62.4 ± 15.5 surgeries/year; p = 0.007). In addition, the number of departments implanting slings decreased over the investigated time period (from 34 to 10; p < 0.001). This particularly affected departments that also had a low number of RPE/year (from 9 to 0; -100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The situation of surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in Germany shows a clear decline in sling implantation, especially in small departments. On the one hand, this reflects the increasingly differentiated indications for sling implantation. On the other hand, it raises the suspicion that a gap in care has developed, as the decline was not compensated for by other surgical therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"673-680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02360-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence in men is predominantly iatrogenic after radical prostatectomy or transurethral interventions. Current studies show that there is a deficit in the availability of surgical therapy not only in Germany. The aim of this study is to investigate in more detail the structural health care situation of surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany.

Materials and methods: The evaluation of the surgical therapy of male stress incontinence in Germany is based on the OPS (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel-German procedural classification) codes from hospital quality reports from 2011-2019.

Results: From 2012-2019, the number of male incontinence surgeries declined from 2191 to 1445. The number of departments performing incontinence surgeries decreased from 275 to 244. In the multivariate analysis, a high number (≥ 50) of radical prostatectomies/year (RPE/year) is an independent predictor of a high-volume centre (≥ 10 procedures/year; odds ratio [OR] 6.4 [2.3-17.6]; p < 0.001). The most significant decrease was in sling surgery (from 1091 to 410; p < 0.001). Here, the number of cases decreased especially in departments that implanted a high number of slings (≥ 10 slings/year; -69%; -62.4 ± 15.5 surgeries/year; p = 0.007). In addition, the number of departments implanting slings decreased over the investigated time period (from 34 to 10; p < 0.001). This particularly affected departments that also had a low number of RPE/year (from 9 to 0; -100%).

Conclusion: The situation of surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in Germany shows a clear decline in sling implantation, especially in small departments. On the one hand, this reflects the increasingly differentiated indications for sling implantation. On the other hand, it raises the suspicion that a gap in care has developed, as the decline was not compensated for by other surgical therapies.

[德国男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗中的结构性医疗现实]。
背景:男性压力性尿失禁主要是根治性前列腺切除术或经尿道介入术后引起的。目前的研究表明,不仅在德国,手术治疗也存在不足。本研究旨在更详细地调查德国男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的结构性医疗状况:对德国男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的评估基于2011-2019年医院质量报告中的OPS(Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel-德国手术分类)代码:2012-2019年,男性尿失禁手术数量从2191例降至1445例。实施尿失禁手术的科室数量从275个减少到244个。在多变量分析中,根治性前列腺切除术数量多(≥ 50 例)/年(RPE/年)是高容量中心的独立预测因素(≥ 10 例/年;几率比 [OR] 6.4 [2.3-17.6];P 结论:德国男性压力性尿失禁的手术治疗情况表明,吊带植入术明显减少,尤其是在小科室。一方面,这反映出植入吊带的适应症越来越多样化。另一方面,由于其他手术疗法无法弥补下降的趋势,这也让人怀疑医疗服务出现了缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信