[Paresis of an upper extremity. Action observation and motor imagery in recovery of patients with chronic stroke].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
G Valadez-Roque, J Cantillo-Negrete, R I Carino-Escobar, A Torres-Chávez
{"title":"[Paresis of an upper extremity. Action observation and motor imagery in recovery of patients with chronic stroke].","authors":"G Valadez-Roque, J Cantillo-Negrete, R I Carino-Escobar, A Torres-Chávez","doi":"10.33588/rn.7811.2024017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) are considered functionally equivalent forms of motor representation related to movement execution (ME). Because of their characteristics, AO and MI have been proposed as techniques to facilitate the recovery of post-stroke hemiparesis in the upper extremities.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An experimental, longitudinal, prospective, single-blinded design was undertaken. Eleven patients participated, and were randomly assigned to each study group. Both groups received 10 to 12 sessions of physical therapy. Five patients were assigned to the control treatment group, and six patients to the experimental treatment group (AO + MI). All were assessed before and after treatment for function, strength (newtons) and mobility (percentage) in the affected limb, as well as alpha desynchronisation (8-13 Hz) in the supplementary motor area, the premotor cortex and primary motor cortex while performing AO + MI tasks and action observation plus motor execution (AO + ME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group presented improvement in function and strength. A negative correlation was found between desynchronisation in the supplementary motor area and function, as well as a post-treatment increase in desynchronisation in the premotor cortex of the injured hemisphere in the experimental group only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An AO + MI-based intervention positively impacts recovery of the paretic upper extremity by stimulating the supplementary motor area, a cortex involved in movement preparation and learning. AO + MI therapy can be used as adjunctive treatment in patients with upper extremity paresis following chronic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7811.2024017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) are considered functionally equivalent forms of motor representation related to movement execution (ME). Because of their characteristics, AO and MI have been proposed as techniques to facilitate the recovery of post-stroke hemiparesis in the upper extremities.

Patients and methods: An experimental, longitudinal, prospective, single-blinded design was undertaken. Eleven patients participated, and were randomly assigned to each study group. Both groups received 10 to 12 sessions of physical therapy. Five patients were assigned to the control treatment group, and six patients to the experimental treatment group (AO + MI). All were assessed before and after treatment for function, strength (newtons) and mobility (percentage) in the affected limb, as well as alpha desynchronisation (8-13 Hz) in the supplementary motor area, the premotor cortex and primary motor cortex while performing AO + MI tasks and action observation plus motor execution (AO + ME).

Results: The experimental group presented improvement in function and strength. A negative correlation was found between desynchronisation in the supplementary motor area and function, as well as a post-treatment increase in desynchronisation in the premotor cortex of the injured hemisphere in the experimental group only.

Conclusions: An AO + MI-based intervention positively impacts recovery of the paretic upper extremity by stimulating the supplementary motor area, a cortex involved in movement preparation and learning. AO + MI therapy can be used as adjunctive treatment in patients with upper extremity paresis following chronic stroke.

[上肢麻痹。动作观察和运动想象在慢性中风患者康复中的应用]。
导言:动作观察(AO)和运动想象(MI)被认为是与动作执行(ME)相关的功能等同的运动表征形式。由于它们的特点,动作观察和运动想象被认为是促进中风后上肢偏瘫恢复的技术:采用实验性、纵向、前瞻性、单盲设计。11名患者参加了研究,并被随机分配到每个研究组。两组患者均接受了 10 至 12 次物理治疗。五名患者被分配到对照治疗组,六名患者被分配到实验治疗组(AO + MI)。所有患者在治疗前后均接受了患肢功能、力量(牛顿)和活动度(百分比)评估,以及在执行 AO + MI 任务和动作观察加动作执行(AO + ME)时,辅助运动区、前运动皮层和初级运动皮层的阿尔法不同步(8-13 赫兹)评估:实验组在功能和力量方面均有改善。补充运动区的非同步化与功能之间呈负相关,仅实验组受伤半球前运动皮层的非同步化在治疗后有所增加:结论:通过刺激辅助运动区(参与运动准备和学习的皮层),以 AO + MI 为基础的干预措施对瘫痪上肢的恢复产生了积极影响。AO + MI疗法可作为慢性中风后上肢瘫痪患者的辅助治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信