Chemical control of wheat sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps, by UAV sprayer and very low volume knapsack sprayer

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Aziz Sheikhigarjan, Mahmoud Safari, Mostafa Mansour Ghazi, Ali Zarnegar, Shahram Shahrokhi, Nikrooz Bagheri, Saeed Moein, Peyman Seyedin
{"title":"Chemical control of wheat sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps, by UAV sprayer and very low volume knapsack sprayer","authors":"Aziz Sheikhigarjan, Mahmoud Safari, Mostafa Mansour Ghazi, Ali Zarnegar, Shahram Shahrokhi, Nikrooz Bagheri, Saeed Moein, Peyman Seyedin","doi":"10.1007/s12600-024-01166-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae), is one of the most important pests of wheat crops in Iran and the Middle East. Chemical control by high-volume spraying is the most common method of controlling this pest. The current ground sprayers lack advanced spraying technologies, which results in low efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayer for the chemical control of wheat Sunn pest. The effectiveness, field capacity, and costs of chemical insecticide application were compared between the UAV sprayer and the Very Low Volume (VLV) Knapsack Sprayer (KS). We found that the chemical control effectiveness of the two spraying methods was not significantly different. The UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer had an effectiveness percentage of more than 95%. The UAV sprayer was better than the other in terms of field capacity, insecticide dosage ml ha-1, spray volume L ha-1, reduced drift, and the probability of the operator exposure. The field capacities of the UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer were 3.75 and 0.5 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volumes were 14.6 and 30.0 L ha-1, respectively.5.5 and 0.8 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volume was 14.6 and 30.0 L ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":20220,"journal":{"name":"Phytoparasitica","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoparasitica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01166-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae), is one of the most important pests of wheat crops in Iran and the Middle East. Chemical control by high-volume spraying is the most common method of controlling this pest. The current ground sprayers lack advanced spraying technologies, which results in low efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayer for the chemical control of wheat Sunn pest. The effectiveness, field capacity, and costs of chemical insecticide application were compared between the UAV sprayer and the Very Low Volume (VLV) Knapsack Sprayer (KS). We found that the chemical control effectiveness of the two spraying methods was not significantly different. The UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer had an effectiveness percentage of more than 95%. The UAV sprayer was better than the other in terms of field capacity, insecticide dosage ml ha-1, spray volume L ha-1, reduced drift, and the probability of the operator exposure. The field capacities of the UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer were 3.75 and 0.5 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volumes were 14.6 and 30.0 L ha-1, respectively.5.5 and 0.8 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volume was 14.6 and 30.0 L ha−1, respectively.

Abstract Image

利用无人机喷雾器和超低容量背负式喷雾器对小麦害虫 Eurygaster integriceps 进行化学防治
苏南害虫 Eurygaster integriceps Puton(异翅目:Scutelleridae)是伊朗和中东地区小麦作物最重要的害虫之一。通过大量喷洒进行化学防治是控制这种害虫最常用的方法。目前的地面喷雾器缺乏先进的喷雾技术,导致效率低下。本研究旨在调查使用无人机(UAV)喷雾器对小麦逊农害虫进行化学防治的效果。比较了无人机喷雾器和超低容量背负式喷雾器(KS)在化学杀虫剂施用方面的效果、田间容量和成本。我们发现,两种喷洒方法的化学防治效果没有显著差异。无人机喷雾器和超低容量背负式喷雾器的有效率超过 95%。无人机喷雾器在田间容量、杀虫剂用量毫升/公顷-1、喷洒量升/公顷-1、减少漂移和操作人员接触概率等方面均优于其他喷雾器。无人机喷雾器和 VLV 背负式喷雾器的田间作业能力分别为每小时 3.75 公顷和 0.5 公顷,喷洒量分别为每公顷 14.6 升和 30.0 升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytoparasitica
Phytoparasitica 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytoparasitica is an international journal on Plant Protection, that publishes original research contributions on the biological, chemical and molecular aspects of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Virology, Nematology, and Weed Sciences, which strives to improve scientific knowledge and technology for IPM, in forest and agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica emphasizes new insights into plant disease and pest etiology, epidemiology, host-parasite/pest biochemistry and cell biology, ecology and population biology, host genetics and resistance, disease vector biology, plant stress and biotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins. Research can cover aspects related to the nature of plant diseases, pests and weeds, the causal agents, their spread, the losses they cause, crop loss assessment, and novel tactics and approaches for their management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信