The Impact of Primary Care Clinic and Family Physician Continuity on Patient Health Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis From Alberta, Canada.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Terrence McDonald, Paul E Ronksley, Lisa L Cook, Alka B Patel, Seidel Judy, Brendan Cord Lethebe, Lee A Green
{"title":"The Impact of Primary Care Clinic and Family Physician Continuity on Patient Health Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis From Alberta, Canada.","authors":"Terrence McDonald, Paul E Ronksley, Lisa L Cook, Alka B Patel, Seidel Judy, Brendan Cord Lethebe, Lee A Green","doi":"10.1370/afm.3107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuity of care is broadly associated with better patient health outcomes. The relative contributions of continuity with an individual physician and with a practice, however, have not generally been distinguished. This retrospective observational study examined the impact of continuity of care for patients seen at their main clinic but by different family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed linked health administrative data from 2015-2018 from Alberta, Canada to explore the association of physician and clinic continuity with rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations across varying levels of patient complexity. Physician continuity was calculated using the known provider of care index and clinic continuity with an analogous measure. We developed zero-inflated negative binomial models to assess the association of each with all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High physician continuity was associated with lower ED use across all levels of patient complexity and with fewer hospitalizations for highly complex patients. Broadly, no (0%) clinic continuity was associated with increased use and complete (100%) clinic continuity with decreased use, with the largest effect seen for the most complex patients. Levels of clinic continuity between 1% and 50% were generally associated with slightly higher use, and levels of 51% to 99% with slightly lower use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best health care outcomes (measured by ED visits and hospitalizations) are associated with consistently seeing one's own primary family physician or seeing a clinic partner when that physician is unavailable. The effect of partial clinic continuity appears complex and requires additional research. These results provide some reassurance for part-time and shared practices, and guidance for primary care workforce policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Continuity of care is broadly associated with better patient health outcomes. The relative contributions of continuity with an individual physician and with a practice, however, have not generally been distinguished. This retrospective observational study examined the impact of continuity of care for patients seen at their main clinic but by different family physicians.

Methods: We analyzed linked health administrative data from 2015-2018 from Alberta, Canada to explore the association of physician and clinic continuity with rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations across varying levels of patient complexity. Physician continuity was calculated using the known provider of care index and clinic continuity with an analogous measure. We developed zero-inflated negative binomial models to assess the association of each with all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations.

Results: High physician continuity was associated with lower ED use across all levels of patient complexity and with fewer hospitalizations for highly complex patients. Broadly, no (0%) clinic continuity was associated with increased use and complete (100%) clinic continuity with decreased use, with the largest effect seen for the most complex patients. Levels of clinic continuity between 1% and 50% were generally associated with slightly higher use, and levels of 51% to 99% with slightly lower use.

Conclusions: The best health care outcomes (measured by ED visits and hospitalizations) are associated with consistently seeing one's own primary family physician or seeing a clinic partner when that physician is unavailable. The effect of partial clinic continuity appears complex and requires additional research. These results provide some reassurance for part-time and shared practices, and guidance for primary care workforce policy makers.

初级保健诊所和家庭医生的连续性对患者健康结果的影响:加拿大艾伯塔省的回顾性分析。
目的:医疗服务的连续性与更好的患者健康结果有着广泛的联系。然而,人们通常并未区分持续性对单个医生和诊所的相对贡献。这项回顾性观察研究考察了在主要诊所就诊但由不同家庭医生诊治的患者所接受的连续性医疗服务的影响:我们分析了加拿大艾伯塔省 2015-2018 年的关联健康管理数据,以探讨医生和诊所的连续性与不同患者复杂程度的急诊室就诊率和住院率之间的关联。医生连续性采用已知的医疗服务提供者指数计算,诊所连续性采用类似的测量方法计算。我们建立了零膨胀负二叉模型,以评估每种方法与全因急诊室就诊和住院的关系:结果:医生的高度连续性与患者所有复杂程度的急诊室就诊率较低、高度复杂患者的住院率较低有关。总体而言,没有(0%)连续性与就诊次数增加有关,完全(100%)连续性与就诊次数减少有关,对病情最复杂的患者影响最大。诊所连续性水平在1%到50%之间时,使用率一般略高,而在51%到99%之间时,使用率略低:结论:最好的医疗保健结果(以急诊室就诊和住院治疗来衡量)与坚持看自己的家庭主治医生或在该医生不在时看诊所合作伙伴有关。部分诊所连续性的影响似乎很复杂,需要进一步研究。这些结果为兼职和共同实践提供了一些保证,也为初级医疗队伍政策制定者提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信