Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross-linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 12-month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial
{"title":"Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross-linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 12-month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Izabela Skierska, Bartłomiej Górski, Łukasz Fus","doi":"10.1002/JPER.24-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the influence of the adjunctive application of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions, using a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (MCAT+SCTG±HA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A randomized, split-mouth, double-masked comparison of the effects of MCAT+HA+SCTG (test) versus MCAT+SCTG (control) in the treatment of multiple, contralateral gingival recessions with clinical, esthetic, and histological evaluations was carried out. All samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, Verhoeff–Van Gieson, and Alcian blue stain for semiquantitative evaluation. The primary outcome variable was 12-month mean root coverage (MRC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients with 266 gingival recessions received both control and test treatments (133 recessions per group). 12-month MRC of the MCAT+HA+SCTG group was not significantly different from the MCAT+SCTG group with 84.32%± 34.46% and 85.71%± 36.43%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.991). Both treatment modes produced favorable esthetic outcomes (root coverage esthetic score [RES] 9.51± 1.01 tests vs. 9.26± 1.10 controls, <i>p</i> = 0.7292). However, the application of HA improved soft tissue texture (<i>p</i> = 0.0091). The remaining end point measures did not differ significantly between groups. Histological evaluation showed a significantly greater number of elastic fibers and a moderate increase in collagen fiber density in biopsy samples taken from the test sides when compared to the control sides (<i>p</i> = 0.0419 and <i>p</i> = 0.300, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>MCAT+SCTG is an effective procedure in the treatment of multiple recession Type 1 (RT1) and RT2 recessions. There were no statistically significant differences in evaluated clinical treatment outcomes in the MCAT+HA+SCTG group compared to the MCAT+SCTG group within a period of 12 months. The application of HA increased collagen and elastic fiber density.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"95 11","pages":"1060-1072"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/JPER.24-0093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study evaluated the influence of the adjunctive application of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions, using a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (MCAT+SCTG±HA).
Methods
A randomized, split-mouth, double-masked comparison of the effects of MCAT+HA+SCTG (test) versus MCAT+SCTG (control) in the treatment of multiple, contralateral gingival recessions with clinical, esthetic, and histological evaluations was carried out. All samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, Verhoeff–Van Gieson, and Alcian blue stain for semiquantitative evaluation. The primary outcome variable was 12-month mean root coverage (MRC).
Results
Twenty-four patients with 266 gingival recessions received both control and test treatments (133 recessions per group). 12-month MRC of the MCAT+HA+SCTG group was not significantly different from the MCAT+SCTG group with 84.32%± 34.46% and 85.71%± 36.43%, respectively (p = 0.991). Both treatment modes produced favorable esthetic outcomes (root coverage esthetic score [RES] 9.51± 1.01 tests vs. 9.26± 1.10 controls, p = 0.7292). However, the application of HA improved soft tissue texture (p = 0.0091). The remaining end point measures did not differ significantly between groups. Histological evaluation showed a significantly greater number of elastic fibers and a moderate increase in collagen fiber density in biopsy samples taken from the test sides when compared to the control sides (p = 0.0419 and p = 0.300, respectively).
Conclusions
MCAT+SCTG is an effective procedure in the treatment of multiple recession Type 1 (RT1) and RT2 recessions. There were no statistically significant differences in evaluated clinical treatment outcomes in the MCAT+HA+SCTG group compared to the MCAT+SCTG group within a period of 12 months. The application of HA increased collagen and elastic fiber density.