[Medical negligence in cardiology: enter the lawyers and the experts and, then, the judge].

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Peter J Schwartz, Francesca Lia
{"title":"[Medical negligence in cardiology: enter the lawyers and the experts and, then, the judge].","authors":"Peter J Schwartz, Francesca Lia","doi":"10.1714/4269.42462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Legal proceedings for medical negligence usually origin from painful events and their management is often complex, also at an emotional level, both for the families involved and for the physicians assumed to carry responsibility. Many of these aspects are unfamiliar and unclear to the doctors themselves who then need to interact, together with their lawyers, with judges who must take serious decisions on technical facts not easy to be fully comprehended by non-medical persons.On the basis of our different and highly specific personal experience, we have tried to clarify some of the fundamental issues concerning medico-legal cases. Accordingly, we have discussed the different types of guilt, made the distinction between civil and penal cases, with special focus on one issue which is particularly critical, namely that of the importance of guidelines. We have presented some examples of clinical cases and highlighted some glaring differences existing in the management of medico-legal cases between Italy and the United States. Despite obvious complexities, these differences might suggest some approaches toward the simplification of these proceedings and the shortening of the time involved to reach a conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12510,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","volume":"25 6","pages":"390-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1714/4269.42462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal proceedings for medical negligence usually origin from painful events and their management is often complex, also at an emotional level, both for the families involved and for the physicians assumed to carry responsibility. Many of these aspects are unfamiliar and unclear to the doctors themselves who then need to interact, together with their lawyers, with judges who must take serious decisions on technical facts not easy to be fully comprehended by non-medical persons.On the basis of our different and highly specific personal experience, we have tried to clarify some of the fundamental issues concerning medico-legal cases. Accordingly, we have discussed the different types of guilt, made the distinction between civil and penal cases, with special focus on one issue which is particularly critical, namely that of the importance of guidelines. We have presented some examples of clinical cases and highlighted some glaring differences existing in the management of medico-legal cases between Italy and the United States. Despite obvious complexities, these differences might suggest some approaches toward the simplification of these proceedings and the shortening of the time involved to reach a conclusion.

[心脏病学中的医疗过失:进入律师和专家,然后是法官]。
医疗过失的法律诉讼通常源于痛苦的事件,其处理往往是复杂的,在情感层面上也是 复杂的,无论是对相关家庭还是对承担责任的医生都是如此。医生本身对其中的许多方面并不熟悉,也不清楚,因此需要与律师一起与法官互动,而法官则必须就非医务人员难以完全理解的技术事实做出严肃的裁决。因此,我们讨论了不同类型的罪责,区分了民事案件和刑事案件,并特别强调了一个尤为重要的问题,即指导方针的重要性。我们列举了一些临床案例,并强调了意大利和美国在医学法律案件管理方面存在的一些明显差异。尽管存在着明显的复杂性,但这些差异可以为简化诉讼程序和缩短结案时间提供一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di cardiologia
Giornale italiano di cardiologia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信