Value of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for malignant adrenal tumors: A clinical comparative study.

Qiaowei Du, Xin Li, Zheng Lin, Linan Dong, Fangyi Liu, Ping Liang
{"title":"Value of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for malignant adrenal tumors: A clinical comparative study.","authors":"Qiaowei Du, Xin Li, Zheng Lin, Linan Dong, Fangyi Liu, Ping Liang","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2315_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) for malignant adrenal tumors (MATs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 62 unilateral MAT cases from March 2011 to November 2022. There were a total of 62 lesions, with a mean maximum diameter of 5.4 ± 2.7 cm (range, 1.4-15.7 cm). The patients were categorized into the following, based on the pre-operative planning method: 3D planning (n = 32) and 2D planning (n = 30) groups. A comparative analysis was performed on various parameters, including ablation techniques, tumor-related prognosis, and incidence of complications. This analysis encompassed indicators, such as overall survival (OS) rate and local tumor progression (LTP), among others.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 3-84 months). Notably, compared with the 2D planning group, the 3D planning group exhibited significant disparities in the number of punctures (P = 0.035) and incidence of complications (P = 0.029) and had no significant difference in the OS ( P > 0.05) but had a significantly lower LTP rate (6.2% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.033). In the 3D planning group, the sub-group with a tumor diameter of < 5 cm exhibited a significantly less number of punctures ( P = 0.039), lower input energy ( P = 0.002), and a shorter ablation time ( P = 0.001), compared with the sub-group with a tumor diameter of ≥ 5 cm, but there was no significant difference in the LTP and OS rates between the two sub-groups ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of 3DVAPS in US-PMWA of MATs was advantageous, especially in lesions with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm. It can help in developing more rational surgical plans, reducing the incidence of complications, and extending the local recurrence-free survival time of patients and can add a certain value for precise treatment and expand the indications for ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1232-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2315_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) for malignant adrenal tumors (MATs).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 62 unilateral MAT cases from March 2011 to November 2022. There were a total of 62 lesions, with a mean maximum diameter of 5.4 ± 2.7 cm (range, 1.4-15.7 cm). The patients were categorized into the following, based on the pre-operative planning method: 3D planning (n = 32) and 2D planning (n = 30) groups. A comparative analysis was performed on various parameters, including ablation techniques, tumor-related prognosis, and incidence of complications. This analysis encompassed indicators, such as overall survival (OS) rate and local tumor progression (LTP), among others.

Results: The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 3-84 months). Notably, compared with the 2D planning group, the 3D planning group exhibited significant disparities in the number of punctures (P = 0.035) and incidence of complications (P = 0.029) and had no significant difference in the OS ( P > 0.05) but had a significantly lower LTP rate (6.2% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.033). In the 3D planning group, the sub-group with a tumor diameter of < 5 cm exhibited a significantly less number of punctures ( P = 0.039), lower input energy ( P = 0.002), and a shorter ablation time ( P = 0.001), compared with the sub-group with a tumor diameter of ≥ 5 cm, but there was no significant difference in the LTP and OS rates between the two sub-groups ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The use of 3DVAPS in US-PMWA of MATs was advantageous, especially in lesions with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm. It can help in developing more rational surgical plans, reducing the incidence of complications, and extending the local recurrence-free survival time of patients and can add a certain value for precise treatment and expand the indications for ablation.

三维可视化消融计划系统在超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗恶性肾上腺肿瘤中的价值:临床比较研究。
目的我们旨在评估三维可视化消融计划系统(3DVAPS)在超声引导下经皮微波消融术(US-PMWA)治疗恶性肾上腺肿瘤(MATs)中的有效性和安全性:对2011年3月至2022年11月期间的62例单侧肾上腺恶性肿瘤病例进行了回顾性分析。共有 62 个病灶,平均最大直径为 5.4 ± 2.7 厘米(范围为 1.4-15.7 厘米)。根据术前规划方法,患者被分为以下几类:三维规划组(32 人)和二维规划组(30 人)。对各种参数进行了比较分析,包括消融技术、肿瘤相关预后和并发症发生率。该分析包括总生存(OS)率和局部肿瘤进展(LTP)等指标:中位随访期为30个月(3-84个月)。值得注意的是,与二维计划组相比,三维计划组在穿刺次数(P = 0.035)和并发症发生率(P = 0.029)方面有显著差异,在 OS 方面无显著差异(P > 0.05),但 LTP 率显著降低(6.2% 对 23.3%,P = 0.033)。在三维计划组中,肿瘤直径小于5厘米的亚组与肿瘤直径≥5厘米的亚组相比,穿刺次数明显较少(P = 0.039),输入能量较低(P = 0.002),消融时间较短(P = 0.001),但两个亚组的LTP率和OS率无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:在 MAT 的 US-PMWA 中使用 3DVAPS 具有优势,尤其是在直径≥ 5 厘米的病变中。它有助于制定更合理的手术方案,降低并发症的发生率,延长患者无局部复发的生存时间,并能为精确治疗增加一定的价值,扩大消融术的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信