Real-life impact on antimicrobial prescription of Syndromic Molecular Testing in adults hospitalized in infectious disease departments. Respiratory Syndromic Molecular Testing panel: Is it worth it?

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Séverine Clauss , Stéphane Bourlet , Karim Jaffal , Clara Duran , Emma D’Anglejan , Véronique Perronne , Frédérique Bouchand , Latifa Noussair , Lotfi Dahmane , Aurélien Dinh
{"title":"Real-life impact on antimicrobial prescription of Syndromic Molecular Testing in adults hospitalized in infectious disease departments. Respiratory Syndromic Molecular Testing panel: Is it worth it?","authors":"Séverine Clauss ,&nbsp;Stéphane Bourlet ,&nbsp;Karim Jaffal ,&nbsp;Clara Duran ,&nbsp;Emma D’Anglejan ,&nbsp;Véronique Perronne ,&nbsp;Frédérique Bouchand ,&nbsp;Latifa Noussair ,&nbsp;Lotfi Dahmane ,&nbsp;Aurélien Dinh","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While sensitive molecular diagnostic tests enable accurate and rapid diagnosis of many respiratory viruses, their impact on antibiotic management remains uncertain.</p><p>Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of respiratory syndromic molecular testing panel in real-life clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive study involving consecutive hospitalized patients in an infectious disease department who had been prescribed a respiratory syndromic molecular testing panel on nasopharyngeal swab samples (FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 <em>plus</em>) during hospitalization from October 1st, 2021, to February 28th, 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All in all, 94 out of 210 screened patients were included in the study. Syndromic molecular testing results influenced antibiotic treatment in seven cases: discontinuation in four cases (three virus identifications), changes in two (<em>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</em> positive cases), and initiation in two (negative viral PCRs and one positive bacterial culture).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our study, respiratory syndromic molecular testing had low impact on antibiotic modification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000964/pdfft?md5=e3bd4b3981907961474bf2a31316175d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000964-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While sensitive molecular diagnostic tests enable accurate and rapid diagnosis of many respiratory viruses, their impact on antibiotic management remains uncertain.

Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of respiratory syndromic molecular testing panel in real-life clinical practice.

Method

Retrospective descriptive study involving consecutive hospitalized patients in an infectious disease department who had been prescribed a respiratory syndromic molecular testing panel on nasopharyngeal swab samples (FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 plus) during hospitalization from October 1st, 2021, to February 28th, 2023.

Results

All in all, 94 out of 210 screened patients were included in the study. Syndromic molecular testing results influenced antibiotic treatment in seven cases: discontinuation in four cases (three virus identifications), changes in two (Mycoplasma pneumoniae positive cases), and initiation in two (negative viral PCRs and one positive bacterial culture).

Conclusion

In our study, respiratory syndromic molecular testing had low impact on antibiotic modification.

感染性疾病科住院成人综合征分子检测对抗菌药物处方的实际影响。呼吸道综合征分子检测小组:值得吗?
背景:虽然敏感的分子诊断检测能够准确、快速地诊断多种呼吸道病毒,但其对抗生素管理的影响仍不确定。我们的研究旨在评估呼吸道综合征分子检测小组在实际临床实践中的影响:方法:回顾性描述性研究,涉及 2021 年 10 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 28 日期间感染性疾病科连续住院患者,这些患者在住院期间接受了鼻咽拭子样本呼吸道综合征分子检测面板(FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 plus):总之,210 名接受筛查的患者中有 94 人被纳入研究。综合征分子检测结果影响了7例患者的抗生素治疗:4例停药(3例病毒鉴定),2例改药(肺炎支原体阳性病例),2例开始用药(病毒PCR阴性,1例细菌培养阳性):结论:在我们的研究中,呼吸道综合征分子检测对抗生素调整的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信