Effect of double-premilking teat disinfection protocols on bacterial counts on teat skin of cows and milker gloves in a free-stall-housed dairy herd.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Thiago Resin Niero, Roberto Kappes, Angelica Leticia Scheid, Andreina Ferreira Ramos, Eduardo Becker Ribeiro, Leonardo Leite Cardozo, Sandra Maria Ferraz, André Thaler Neto
{"title":"Effect of double-premilking teat disinfection protocols on bacterial counts on teat skin of cows and milker gloves in a free-stall-housed dairy herd.","authors":"Thiago Resin Niero, Roberto Kappes, Angelica Leticia Scheid, Andreina Ferreira Ramos, Eduardo Becker Ribeiro, Leonardo Leite Cardozo, Sandra Maria Ferraz, André Thaler Neto","doi":"10.1017/S0022029924000335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research communication addresses the hypothesis that double premilking teat disinfection (DD) is more effective in reducing soiling and bacterial count on the cows' teat skin and milkers' gloves than conventional disinfection (CONV). The design was a 3 × 3 Latin square (three groups of cows and three treatments) with conventional teat disinfection (CONV, lactic acid application after forestripping), double teat disinfection using the same disinfectant (DD1D, lactic acid application before and after forestripping), and double teat disinfection using two different disinfectants (DD2D, application of lactic acid before and chlorine-based disinfectant after forestripping). All groups were assigned for six days for each treatment, and the evaluations and samples were collected on the last day, before and after treatment. We evaluated the teat cleanliness score (TCS), count of Gram-negative bacteria (coliforms and noncoliforms), <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., <i>Streptococcus</i> spp., and total bacterial count (TBC) on the cows' teats and TBC on the milkers' gloves. TCS after premilking was lower in DD than CONV treatment. The reduction of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. count was greater in the DD treatment and tended to be higher in the DD2D. The TBC reduction on the cows' teats was greater in the DD treatments. The TBC on the milkers' gloves was lower for DD before and after premilking. In conclusion, DD can be an alternative for reducing some bacterial populations on cow teats and preventing the transmission of microorganisms between cows <i>via</i> the milkers' hands.</p>","PeriodicalId":15615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029924000335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research communication addresses the hypothesis that double premilking teat disinfection (DD) is more effective in reducing soiling and bacterial count on the cows' teat skin and milkers' gloves than conventional disinfection (CONV). The design was a 3 × 3 Latin square (three groups of cows and three treatments) with conventional teat disinfection (CONV, lactic acid application after forestripping), double teat disinfection using the same disinfectant (DD1D, lactic acid application before and after forestripping), and double teat disinfection using two different disinfectants (DD2D, application of lactic acid before and chlorine-based disinfectant after forestripping). All groups were assigned for six days for each treatment, and the evaluations and samples were collected on the last day, before and after treatment. We evaluated the teat cleanliness score (TCS), count of Gram-negative bacteria (coliforms and noncoliforms), Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and total bacterial count (TBC) on the cows' teats and TBC on the milkers' gloves. TCS after premilking was lower in DD than CONV treatment. The reduction of Staphylococcus spp. count was greater in the DD treatment and tended to be higher in the DD2D. The TBC reduction on the cows' teats was greater in the DD treatments. The TBC on the milkers' gloves was lower for DD before and after premilking. In conclusion, DD can be an alternative for reducing some bacterial populations on cow teats and preventing the transmission of microorganisms between cows via the milkers' hands.

双重挤奶乳头消毒方案对自由挤奶厅奶牛群中奶牛乳头皮肤和挤奶工手套上细菌数量的影响。
本研究交流针对的假设是,与传统消毒(CONV)相比,双重挤奶前乳头消毒(DD)能更有效地减少奶牛乳头皮肤和挤奶工手套上的污垢和细菌数量。设计为 3 × 3 拉丁正方形(三组奶牛和三种处理),包括常规乳头消毒(CONV,在林间套管后使用乳酸)、使用相同消毒剂的双乳头消毒(DD1D,在林间套管前后使用乳酸)和使用两种不同消毒剂的双乳头消毒(DD2D,在林间套管前使用乳酸,在林间套管后使用氯基消毒剂)。所有组的每种处理均持续六天,并在最后一天收集处理前后的评价和样本。我们评估了奶牛乳头的清洁度评分(TCS)、革兰氏阴性菌(大肠菌群和非大肠菌群)、葡萄球菌属、链球菌属和细菌总数(TBC),以及挤奶工手套上的细菌总数(TBC)。预挤奶后,DD 处理的 TCS 低于 CONV 处理。DD处理的葡萄球菌数量减少更多,DD2D处理的葡萄球菌数量往往更高。DD处理的奶牛乳头TBC减少量更大。挤奶前和挤奶后,DD 处理的挤奶工手套上的 TBC 较低。总之,DD 是减少奶牛乳头上某些细菌数量和防止微生物通过挤奶工的手在奶牛之间传播的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Research
Journal of Dairy Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dairy Research is an international Journal of high-standing that publishes original scientific research on all aspects of the biology, wellbeing and technology of lactating animals and the foods they produce. The Journal’s ability to cover the entire dairy foods chain is a major strength. Cross-disciplinary research is particularly welcomed, as is comparative lactation research in different dairy and non-dairy species and research dealing with consumer health aspects of dairy products. Journal of Dairy Research: an international Journal of the lactation sciences.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信