"Ulysses" By Numbers by Eric Bulson (review)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
William S. Brockman
{"title":"\"Ulysses\" By Numbers by Eric Bulson (review)","authors":"William S. Brockman","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>\"Ulysses\" By Numbers</em> by Eric Bulson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> William S. Brockman (bio) </li> </ul> <em>\"ULYSSES\" BY NUMBERS</em>, by Eric Bulson. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020. xx + 273 pp. $110.00 cloth. <p>If you thought you had Joyce's number, you should reconsider. \"<em>Ulysses\" by Numbers</em> is a quantitative exploration: \"Counting <em>Ulysses</em> is a way to read it\" (33). Eric Bulson asserts that computation is not the only way, but an opportunity, a perspective, a means of applying quantitative measures to the text, to the paratext, to the physical book, to the sales records, in order to tease out historical and critical insights. What he sometimes refers to as a \"computational\" approach is distinct from distant reading and its aggregation of texts and characteristics. Computation and close reading are not opposed, he argues; rather, \"computation is already close reading\" (8); the book sets out to eke out numbers to be found both in and external to the text.</p> <p>Chapters lead off by posing questions with seemingly obvious answers that lead into quantitative examinations. The question of \"[w]ho wrote <em>Ulysses</em>?\" (39) leads from a brief survey of computer-assisted style analyses that might be applied to the book to devoting further (and more fruitful) attention to the paragraphs of <em>Ulysses</em>. Bulson's simple count of paragraphs per episode fails to establish much, but the quantitative approach makes more sense when applied to the progressive stages of the English language as represented in \"Oxen of the Sun.\" His scrutiny of the widely variable characteristics of Joyce's paragraphs and the question of how to define a <em>Ulysses</em> paragraph is unique and insightful. Bulson notes that Joyce's substantial revisions to the text through the proof stages of the publishing process rarely involved changes to or additions of paragraphs: the paragraph was a critical structural unit throughout the compositional stages of <em>Ulysses</em>. Paragraphs, especially the longer ones, are structural elements of time in <em>Ulysses</em>: \"the longer paragraph functions more like a <em>pocket of time</em>, a place in which the seconds and minutes can expand or slow down\" (59). Here, as in many other parts of the book, Bulson is at his best when he uses the quantification of <em>Ulysses</em> as a springboard to dive into qualitative aspects of the book.</p> <p>\"Why is Joyce's <em>Ulysses</em> as long as it is?\" leads to a proliferation of word counts that examines the initial constraints put on the earlier episodes as Joyce was composing contributions to the <em>Little Review</em> (68). This leads to an observation of the way in which the \"Hades\" episode enables the book to break away from a rough equivalent of word count and lapsed time: an extended section of text can take up <strong>[End Page 151]</strong> virtually no plot time. Counting different words and unique words within each episode shows the way in which the later episodes, particularly beginning with \"Cyclops,\" were more expansive in their vocabulary.</p> <p>\"How many characters are there in <em>Ulysses</em>?\" (101) begs the question of how one counts characters—speaking roles? mentions? allusions? With an illustration of Joyce's manuscript list of characters (a two-page document held at the British Library—102-03), one can see how this system begins to frazzle when one considers characters without active roles but who are only referred to. Bulson's proposed classification of four character levels, ranging from the three \"major major\" characters (Stephen, Leopold, and Molly) to \"minor minor\" characters (non-speaking unnamed entities appearing in only a single episode—109), helps to organize the masses. A diagrammatic representation of the \"character network of all episodes of <em>Ulysses</em>\" (111) attempts to cram onto two-thirds of a page a jungle of names and lines and dots, but the minute printing serves only to point out the function of the multitude of the book's characters in representing the fictional consciousness of the city. Bulson makes much of the 106 characters in \"Wandering Rocks,\" wanting the number to have been one hundred, \"God's number,\" (122) but intriguingly using this as a comparison of quantitative versus qualitative methods. While tabulating the number of characters in <em>Ulysses</em>, he notes that the interior monologue enabled not only \"sense impressions and memories of fictional...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • "Ulysses" By Numbers by Eric Bulson
  • William S. Brockman (bio)
"ULYSSES" BY NUMBERS, by Eric Bulson. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020. xx + 273 pp. $110.00 cloth.

If you thought you had Joyce's number, you should reconsider. "Ulysses" by Numbers is a quantitative exploration: "Counting Ulysses is a way to read it" (33). Eric Bulson asserts that computation is not the only way, but an opportunity, a perspective, a means of applying quantitative measures to the text, to the paratext, to the physical book, to the sales records, in order to tease out historical and critical insights. What he sometimes refers to as a "computational" approach is distinct from distant reading and its aggregation of texts and characteristics. Computation and close reading are not opposed, he argues; rather, "computation is already close reading" (8); the book sets out to eke out numbers to be found both in and external to the text.

Chapters lead off by posing questions with seemingly obvious answers that lead into quantitative examinations. The question of "[w]ho wrote Ulysses?" (39) leads from a brief survey of computer-assisted style analyses that might be applied to the book to devoting further (and more fruitful) attention to the paragraphs of Ulysses. Bulson's simple count of paragraphs per episode fails to establish much, but the quantitative approach makes more sense when applied to the progressive stages of the English language as represented in "Oxen of the Sun." His scrutiny of the widely variable characteristics of Joyce's paragraphs and the question of how to define a Ulysses paragraph is unique and insightful. Bulson notes that Joyce's substantial revisions to the text through the proof stages of the publishing process rarely involved changes to or additions of paragraphs: the paragraph was a critical structural unit throughout the compositional stages of Ulysses. Paragraphs, especially the longer ones, are structural elements of time in Ulysses: "the longer paragraph functions more like a pocket of time, a place in which the seconds and minutes can expand or slow down" (59). Here, as in many other parts of the book, Bulson is at his best when he uses the quantification of Ulysses as a springboard to dive into qualitative aspects of the book.

"Why is Joyce's Ulysses as long as it is?" leads to a proliferation of word counts that examines the initial constraints put on the earlier episodes as Joyce was composing contributions to the Little Review (68). This leads to an observation of the way in which the "Hades" episode enables the book to break away from a rough equivalent of word count and lapsed time: an extended section of text can take up [End Page 151] virtually no plot time. Counting different words and unique words within each episode shows the way in which the later episodes, particularly beginning with "Cyclops," were more expansive in their vocabulary.

"How many characters are there in Ulysses?" (101) begs the question of how one counts characters—speaking roles? mentions? allusions? With an illustration of Joyce's manuscript list of characters (a two-page document held at the British Library—102-03), one can see how this system begins to frazzle when one considers characters without active roles but who are only referred to. Bulson's proposed classification of four character levels, ranging from the three "major major" characters (Stephen, Leopold, and Molly) to "minor minor" characters (non-speaking unnamed entities appearing in only a single episode—109), helps to organize the masses. A diagrammatic representation of the "character network of all episodes of Ulysses" (111) attempts to cram onto two-thirds of a page a jungle of names and lines and dots, but the minute printing serves only to point out the function of the multitude of the book's characters in representing the fictional consciousness of the city. Bulson makes much of the 106 characters in "Wandering Rocks," wanting the number to have been one hundred, "God's number," (122) but intriguingly using this as a comparison of quantitative versus qualitative methods. While tabulating the number of characters in Ulysses, he notes that the interior monologue enabled not only "sense impressions and memories of fictional...

"尤利西斯》数字版,埃里克-布尔森(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: "尤利西斯》数字版,埃里克-布尔森著 威廉-S-布罗克曼(简历)《尤利西斯》数字版,埃里克-布尔森著。纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社,2020 年。xx + 273 页。布版 110.00 美元。如果您认为自己掌握了乔伊斯的电话号码,那么您应该重新考虑一下。数字 "尤利西斯 "是一种定量探索:"计算《尤利西斯》是阅读它的一种方式"(33)。埃里克-布尔森断言,计算不是唯一的方法,而是一种机会、一种视角、一种手段,可以将定量措施应用于文本、副文本、实体书和销售记录,从而揭示历史和批评见解。他有时所说的 "计算 "方法有别于远距离阅读及其对文本和特征的聚合。他认为,计算与精读并不对立;相反,"计算已经是精读"(8);本书的目的是找出文本内外的数字。各章首先提出了一些问题,这些问题的答案看似显而易见,但却引出了定量研究。谁写了《尤利西斯》?(39)这个问题从对可能适用于该书的计算机辅助文体分析的简要调查引出了对《尤利西斯》段落的进一步关注(更富有成效)。布尔逊对每集段落的简单计数并不能确定很多东西,但当定量方法应用于 "太阳之牛 "所代表的英语语言的渐进阶段时,就更有意义了。他对乔伊斯段落千差万别的特点以及如何定义《尤利西斯》段落这一问题的研究独到而深刻。布尔森指出,乔伊斯在出版过程的校对阶段对文本进行的大量修改很少涉及段落的修改或添加:段落是《尤利西斯》整个创作阶段的关键结构单元。段落,尤其是较长的段落,是《尤利西斯》中的时间结构元素:"长段落的功能更像是一个时间的口袋,一个分秒可以扩大或减慢的地方"(59)。在这里,就像在书中的许多其他地方一样,布尔森将《尤利西斯》的量化作为跳板,深入探讨该书的质的方面,这是他最擅长的。"为什么乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》那么长?"这引出了对字数的大量计算,考察了乔伊斯在为《小评论》撰稿时对早期情节的最初限制(68)。这引出了对 "哈迪斯 "情节的观察,"哈迪斯 "情节使该书摆脱了字数和失效时间的粗略等同:一段较长的文字可以几乎不占用 [尾页 151]情节时间。计算每一集中的不同词语和独特词语,可以看出后来的剧集,尤其是从 "独眼巨人 "开始,词汇量更加丰富。"《尤利西斯》中有多少人物?(101)引出了如何计算人物的问题--说话角色?通过乔伊斯手稿中的人物列表(大英图书馆藏有一份两页纸的文件--102-03),我们可以看到,当我们考虑到那些没有活跃角色但只是被提及的人物时,这个系统是如何开始混乱的。布尔森提出了四个角色等级的划分方法,从三个 "主要的主要 "角色(斯蒂芬、利奥波德和莫莉)到 "次要的次要 "角色(只在一集中出现过的不说话的无名人物--109),这有助于将大量角色组织起来。关于"《尤利西斯》所有情节的人物网络"(111)的图示试图在三分之二页的篇幅上挤出人名、线条和点的丛林,但这种微小的印刷只是为了指出书中众多人物在代表城市的虚构意识方面的作用。布尔逊对《漂泊的岩石》中的 106 个人物大加渲染,他希望这个数字是 100,"上帝的数字"(122),但他又将此作为定量与定性方法的比较,这很耐人寻味。在统计《尤利西斯》中的人物数量时,他指出,内心独白不仅使 "虚构的感官印象和记忆......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信