Coil optimization for quasi-helically symmetric stellarator configurations

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS
A. Wiedman, S. Buller, M. Landreman
{"title":"Coil optimization for quasi-helically symmetric stellarator configurations","authors":"A. Wiedman, S. Buller, M. Landreman","doi":"10.1017/s0022377824000540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Filament-based coil optimizations are performed for several quasi-helical stellarator configurations, beginning with the one from Landreman &amp; Paul (<jats:italic>Phys. Rev. Lett.</jats:italic>, vol. 128, 2022, 035001), demonstrating that precise quasi-helical symmetry can be achieved with realistic coils. Several constraints are placed on the shape and spacing of the coils, such as low curvature and sufficient plasma–coil distance for neutron shielding. The coils resulting from this optimization have a maximum curvature 0.8 times that of the coils of the Helically Symmetric eXperiment (HSX) and a mean squared curvature 0.4 times that of the HSX coils when scaled to the same plasma minor radius. When scaled up to reactor size and magnetic field strength, no fast particle losses were found in the free-boundary configuration when simulating 5000 alpha particles launched at <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$3.5\\,\\mathrm {MeV}$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline1.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> on the flux surface with a normalized toroidal flux of <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$s=0.5$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline2.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula>. An analysis of the tolerance of the coils to manufacturing errors is performed using a Gaussian process model, and the coils are found to maintain low particle losses for smooth, large-scale errors up to amplitudes of approximately <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$0.15\\,\\mathrm {m}$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline3.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula>. Another coil optimization is performed for the Landreman–Paul configuration with the additional constraint that the coils are purely planar. Visual inspection of the Poincaré plot of the resulting magnetic field-lines reveal that the planar modular coils alone do a poor job of reproducing the target equilibrium. Additional non-planar coil optimizations are performed for the quasi-helical configuration with <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$5\\,\\%$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline4.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> volume-averaged plasma beta from Landreman <jats:italic>et al.</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>Phys. Plasma</jats:italic>, vol. 29, issue 8, 2022, 082501), and a similar configuration also optimized to satisfy the Mercier criterion. The finite beta configurations had larger fast-particle losses, with the free-boundary Mercier-optimized configuration performing the worst, losing approximately <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$5.5\\,\\%$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline5.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> of alpha particles launched at <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$s=0.5$</jats:tex-math> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0022377824000540_inline6.png\"/> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula>.","PeriodicalId":16846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plasma Physics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plasma Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022377824000540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Filament-based coil optimizations are performed for several quasi-helical stellarator configurations, beginning with the one from Landreman & Paul (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 128, 2022, 035001), demonstrating that precise quasi-helical symmetry can be achieved with realistic coils. Several constraints are placed on the shape and spacing of the coils, such as low curvature and sufficient plasma–coil distance for neutron shielding. The coils resulting from this optimization have a maximum curvature 0.8 times that of the coils of the Helically Symmetric eXperiment (HSX) and a mean squared curvature 0.4 times that of the HSX coils when scaled to the same plasma minor radius. When scaled up to reactor size and magnetic field strength, no fast particle losses were found in the free-boundary configuration when simulating 5000 alpha particles launched at $3.5\,\mathrm {MeV}$ on the flux surface with a normalized toroidal flux of $s=0.5$ . An analysis of the tolerance of the coils to manufacturing errors is performed using a Gaussian process model, and the coils are found to maintain low particle losses for smooth, large-scale errors up to amplitudes of approximately $0.15\,\mathrm {m}$ . Another coil optimization is performed for the Landreman–Paul configuration with the additional constraint that the coils are purely planar. Visual inspection of the Poincaré plot of the resulting magnetic field-lines reveal that the planar modular coils alone do a poor job of reproducing the target equilibrium. Additional non-planar coil optimizations are performed for the quasi-helical configuration with $5\,\%$ volume-averaged plasma beta from Landreman et al. (Phys. Plasma, vol. 29, issue 8, 2022, 082501), and a similar configuration also optimized to satisfy the Mercier criterion. The finite beta configurations had larger fast-particle losses, with the free-boundary Mercier-optimized configuration performing the worst, losing approximately $5.5\,\%$ of alpha particles launched at $s=0.5$ .
准对称恒星器配置的线圈优化
从 Landreman & Paul(《物理评论快报》,第 128 卷,2022 年,035001 期)的构型开始,对几种准螺旋恒星器构型进行了基于丝状线圈的优化,证明可以用现实的线圈实现精确的准螺旋对称性。对线圈的形状和间距施加了一些限制,如低曲率和足够的等离子体-线圈距离以屏蔽中子。优化后的线圈的最大曲率是螺旋对称实验(HSX)线圈的 0.8 倍,在等离子体小半径相同的情况下,平均曲率平方是 HSX 线圈的 0.4 倍。当放大到反应堆尺寸和磁场强度时,在自由边界配置中,当模拟在通量表面以 3.5 美元/mathrm {MeV}$ 的速度发射 5000 颗阿尔法粒子时,没有发现快速粒子损失,归一化环形通量为 0.5 美元/mathrm {MeV}$ 。使用高斯过程模型对线圈对制造误差的容限进行了分析,发现线圈能够在振幅约为0.15\\mathrm {m}$的平滑大尺度误差下保持较低的粒子损耗。针对 Landreman-Paul 配置进行了另一次线圈优化,额外的限制条件是线圈是纯平面的。对所得到的磁场线的波恩卡雷图进行目测后发现,仅凭平面模块线圈并不能很好地再现目标平衡。针对兰德雷曼等人(《物理等离子体》,第 29 卷,第 8 期,2022 年,082501)提出的具有 5 美元(\,\%$)体积平均等离子体贝塔值的准螺旋配置,以及为满足梅歇准则而优化的类似配置,进行了额外的非平面线圈优化。有限β配置的快速粒子损失较大,自由边界梅西埃优化配置的表现最差,在$s=0.5$时发射的α粒子损失约为$5.5\,\%$。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plasma Physics
Journal of Plasma Physics 物理-物理:流体与等离子体
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JPP aspires to be the intellectual home of those who think of plasma physics as a fundamental discipline. The journal focuses on publishing research on laboratory plasmas (including magnetically confined and inertial fusion plasmas), space physics and plasma astrophysics that takes advantage of the rapid ongoing progress in instrumentation and computing to advance fundamental understanding of multiscale plasma physics. The Journal welcomes submissions of analytical, numerical, observational and experimental work: both original research and tutorial- or review-style papers, as well as proposals for its Lecture Notes series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信