{"title":"Two Hundred Years of the Lancet: From Quack to Anti-Vax, or How the Lancet Took a Stand","authors":"Marysa Demoor","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay traces the rise of the <i>Lancet</i> from its humble nineteenth-century beginnings to its current status as one of the most prestigious medical journals. By examining the <i>Lancet</i>'s early years and the hopes of founding editor Thomas Wakely and his successors, I aim to reveal what distinguished this journal from others circulating at the time and guaranteed its longevity. Despite fierce competition with several early medical journals, including the <i>British Medical Journal</i> and a quack publication that called itself the <i>Anti</i>-<i>Lancet</i>, the <i>Lancet</i> continued to publish research-based information to instruct the medical community far and wide. Indeed, while fake news and anti-vaxers might seem like twenty-first-century problems, this paper shows how the <i>Lancet</i> has been addressing misinformation for two hundred years.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:
This essay traces the rise of the Lancet from its humble nineteenth-century beginnings to its current status as one of the most prestigious medical journals. By examining the Lancet's early years and the hopes of founding editor Thomas Wakely and his successors, I aim to reveal what distinguished this journal from others circulating at the time and guaranteed its longevity. Despite fierce competition with several early medical journals, including the British Medical Journal and a quack publication that called itself the Anti-Lancet, the Lancet continued to publish research-based information to instruct the medical community far and wide. Indeed, while fake news and anti-vaxers might seem like twenty-first-century problems, this paper shows how the Lancet has been addressing misinformation for two hundred years.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
