On the Text and Interpretation of Accius 306-307 Dangel

IF 0.4 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

MNEMOSYNE Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1163/1568525x-bja1023

Basil L.P. Nelis

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that the text of Accius 306-307 Dangel, as transmitted, cannot stand on grammatical grounds. It aims to clarify the use of the word cuiatis, propose an emendation of the text, and suggest a new explanation of the metre of the fragment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论《阿基里斯》的文本和释义 306-307 丹吉尔

本文认为，《Accius 306-307 Dangel》的传世文本在语法上站不住脚。文章旨在澄清 "cuiatis "一词的用法，对文本提出修改建议，并对该片段的节拍提出新的解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

MNEMOSYNE CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.