ACL and Graft Choices in the Aging Athlete

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Zoe W. Hinton , Alison P. Toth
{"title":"ACL and Graft Choices in the Aging Athlete","authors":"Zoe W. Hinton ,&nbsp;Alison P. Toth","doi":"10.1016/j.otsm.2024.151086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-established procedure utilized in the setting of ACL injuries in patients under age 40. The management of ACL injuries in older populations is controversial as best practices are not clear with regard to candidacy for surgery, graft choice, fixation, and rehabilitation. In this review, we examined the body of literature surrounding controversies in management of ACL tears in older patients. Specific foci include nonoperative management, clinical course of osteoarthritis with ACLR, graft choice, graft fixation, complications, and alternative surgical options. The aging athlete with ACL-deficiency may benefit from non-operative management with rehabilitation if they are low demand, have minimal instability, and do not have moderate to severe or multi-compartmental osteoarthritis. Prehabilitation may also be beneficial to patients in the to determine if they can recover from injury to achieve an acceptable state of function before deciding upon surgery. ACLR is a viable option in older patient populations with minimal osteoarthritis and instability who have failed conservative management. Patients undergoing ACLR are likely to develop worsening radiographic OA. Despite this radiographic OA, majority of patients have improvements in PROMs and return to function. Given the risks of TKA after ACLR, shared clinical decision making should be prioritized with each patient regarding pursuit of ACLR versus conservative management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54678,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 151086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060187224000273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-established procedure utilized in the setting of ACL injuries in patients under age 40. The management of ACL injuries in older populations is controversial as best practices are not clear with regard to candidacy for surgery, graft choice, fixation, and rehabilitation. In this review, we examined the body of literature surrounding controversies in management of ACL tears in older patients. Specific foci include nonoperative management, clinical course of osteoarthritis with ACLR, graft choice, graft fixation, complications, and alternative surgical options. The aging athlete with ACL-deficiency may benefit from non-operative management with rehabilitation if they are low demand, have minimal instability, and do not have moderate to severe or multi-compartmental osteoarthritis. Prehabilitation may also be beneficial to patients in the to determine if they can recover from injury to achieve an acceptable state of function before deciding upon surgery. ACLR is a viable option in older patient populations with minimal osteoarthritis and instability who have failed conservative management. Patients undergoing ACLR are likely to develop worsening radiographic OA. Despite this radiographic OA, majority of patients have improvements in PROMs and return to function. Given the risks of TKA after ACLR, shared clinical decision making should be prioritized with each patient regarding pursuit of ACLR versus conservative management.

老年运动员的前交叉韧带和移植选择
前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)是一种成熟的手术方法,适用于 40 岁以下的前交叉韧带损伤患者。由于在手术适应症、移植物选择、固定和康复等方面的最佳实践尚不明确,因此老年前交叉韧带损伤的治疗仍存在争议。在这篇综述中,我们研究了围绕老年患者前交叉韧带撕裂治疗争议的大量文献。具体重点包括非手术治疗、前交叉韧带撕裂的骨关节炎临床过程、移植物的选择、移植物的固定、并发症以及替代手术方案。前交叉韧带缺损的老年运动员如果要求不高、不稳定性很小、没有中度至重度或多室骨关节炎,可能会从非手术治疗和康复中获益。在决定手术之前,预康复治疗也可能对患者有益,以确定他们能否从损伤中恢复到可接受的功能状态。对于骨关节炎和不稳定性较轻且保守治疗失败的老年患者,前交叉韧带重建是一种可行的选择。接受前交叉韧带重建术的患者很可能会出现影像学上的 OA 恶化。尽管出现了影像学上的 OA,但大多数患者的 PROMs 都有所改善并恢复了功能。鉴于前交叉韧带置换术后进行 TKA 的风险,应优先与每位患者共同做出临床决策,决定是否进行前交叉韧带置换术或保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine combines the authority of a textbook, the usefulness of a color atlas and the timeliness of a journal. Each issue focuses on a single clinical condition, offering several different management approaches. It''s the easiest way for practitioners to stay informed of the latest surgical advancements and developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信