Cognitive inflexibility, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and traits and poor post-pandemic adjustment

Ana Maria Frota Lisboa Pereira de Souza , Luca Pellegrini , Naomi Anne Fineberg
{"title":"Cognitive inflexibility, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and traits and poor post-pandemic adjustment","authors":"Ana Maria Frota Lisboa Pereira de Souza ,&nbsp;Luca Pellegrini ,&nbsp;Naomi Anne Fineberg","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to flexibly adapt thoughts and behaviours represents a fundamental attribute for behavioural success. Impairments in aspects of cognitive flexibility are found as transdiagnostic latent phenotypes of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology and are present within a range of mental disorders and within the population at large. In this narrative review, we focus on the attentional set-shifting aspect of cognitive inflexibility, which has been largely investigated in the context of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and is thought to underpin perseverative symptomatology. We appraise the published literature relating to the putative neurobiological mechanisms, methods of assessment, interventional approaches, and health and wellbeing impacts. We discuss critical knowledge gaps, promising new research avenues, and potential interventional approaches from a clinical and public health perspective. We conclude that cognitive inflexibility has relevance for clinicians in terms of understanding clinical outcomes and tailoring personalised forms of treatments, and for public health professionals in terms of understanding rigid attitudes and adjustment in the current post-pandemic environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 104073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408524001388/pdfft?md5=1845283755c134388f1679a29230296e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772408524001388-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408524001388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to flexibly adapt thoughts and behaviours represents a fundamental attribute for behavioural success. Impairments in aspects of cognitive flexibility are found as transdiagnostic latent phenotypes of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology and are present within a range of mental disorders and within the population at large. In this narrative review, we focus on the attentional set-shifting aspect of cognitive inflexibility, which has been largely investigated in the context of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and is thought to underpin perseverative symptomatology. We appraise the published literature relating to the putative neurobiological mechanisms, methods of assessment, interventional approaches, and health and wellbeing impacts. We discuss critical knowledge gaps, promising new research avenues, and potential interventional approaches from a clinical and public health perspective. We conclude that cognitive inflexibility has relevance for clinicians in terms of understanding clinical outcomes and tailoring personalised forms of treatments, and for public health professionals in terms of understanding rigid attitudes and adjustment in the current post-pandemic environment.

认知不灵活、强迫症状和特征以及大流行后适应不良。
灵活调整思想和行为的能力是行为成功的基本属性。认知灵活性方面的缺陷是强迫症状的跨诊断潜在表型,存在于一系列精神障碍和人群中。在这篇叙事性综述中,我们将重点放在认知灵活性不足的注意集转移方面,该方面的研究主要集中在强迫症谱系障碍方面,并被认为是持久性症状的基础。我们对已发表的文献进行了评估,这些文献涉及假定的神经生物学机制、评估方法、干预方法以及对健康和幸福的影响。我们从临床和公共卫生的角度讨论了关键的知识缺口、有前景的新研究途径以及潜在的干预方法。我们的结论是,认知缺乏灵活性对临床医生了解临床结果和定制个性化治疗方案具有重要意义,对公共卫生专业人员了解当前流行病后环境中的僵化态度和适应能力也具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信