Effects of different tillage and cropping systems on water repellency and hydraulic properties in a tropical Alfisol of southwestern Nigeria

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Funke Florence Akinola , Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin , Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi
{"title":"Effects of different tillage and cropping systems on water repellency and hydraulic properties in a tropical Alfisol of southwestern Nigeria","authors":"Funke Florence Akinola ,&nbsp;Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin ,&nbsp;Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the effects of growing intercrops (Sorghum, SOR (<em>Sorghum bicolor</em> L. <em>Moench</em>) in between rows of cowpea, COW (<em>Vigna unguiculata</em>) and soybean, SOY (<em>Glyxine</em> max <em>L.Merr</em>)) under different tillage systems on soil physico-chemical properties, soil water sorptivity (<em>S</em><sub><em>w</em></sub>), hydraulic conductivity (K), and soil hydrophobicity (<em>R)</em> in tropical Alfisol of Southwestern Nigeria. Results demonstrated cropping systems significantly impacted soil pH under each conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and compacted no till systems (NT<sub>C</sub>) tillage system in 2019, but not in the 2020 cropping season. Sorghum-cowpea SC) and sorghum-soybean (SS) intercropping systems under the three tillage systems had higher soil organic matter (SOM) contents than the corresponding sole sorghum (SOR) at the end of the study. Soil water sorptivity differed significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) among the cropping systems in 2019 and follows the order: SC &gt; SS &gt; SOY &gt; SOR &gt; COW while in 2020, averaged over three tillage systems, mean Sw values showed an increasing trend in the order: SOR (77.67 cm h<sup>-1/2</sup>) &lt; COW (82.42 cm h<sup>-1/2</sup>) &lt; SOY (88.00 cm h<sup>-1/2</sup>) &lt; SS (88.73 cm h<sup>-1/2</sup>) &lt; SC (98.29 cm h<sup>-1/2</sup>). In general, intercropping had a lower R than sole cropping. NT<sub>C</sub> soil was 46.48% and 56.39%; 32.47% and 41.67% more hydrophobic than soils under NT and CT in 2019 and 2020. Intercropping with legumes might have contributed to the higher K levels. Organic matter in soil improves conductivity by improving soil structure. The intercrop may have improved soil water conservation because of their shading and better soil protection. The study demonstrated that conservation tillage with intercropping could effectively enhance soil hydraulic properties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article e00815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424000622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of growing intercrops (Sorghum, SOR (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in between rows of cowpea, COW (Vigna unguiculata) and soybean, SOY (Glyxine max L.Merr)) under different tillage systems on soil physico-chemical properties, soil water sorptivity (Sw), hydraulic conductivity (K), and soil hydrophobicity (R) in tropical Alfisol of Southwestern Nigeria. Results demonstrated cropping systems significantly impacted soil pH under each conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and compacted no till systems (NTC) tillage system in 2019, but not in the 2020 cropping season. Sorghum-cowpea SC) and sorghum-soybean (SS) intercropping systems under the three tillage systems had higher soil organic matter (SOM) contents than the corresponding sole sorghum (SOR) at the end of the study. Soil water sorptivity differed significantly (p < 0.001) among the cropping systems in 2019 and follows the order: SC > SS > SOY > SOR > COW while in 2020, averaged over three tillage systems, mean Sw values showed an increasing trend in the order: SOR (77.67 cm h-1/2) < COW (82.42 cm h-1/2) < SOY (88.00 cm h-1/2) < SS (88.73 cm h-1/2) < SC (98.29 cm h-1/2). In general, intercropping had a lower R than sole cropping. NTC soil was 46.48% and 56.39%; 32.47% and 41.67% more hydrophobic than soils under NT and CT in 2019 and 2020. Intercropping with legumes might have contributed to the higher K levels. Organic matter in soil improves conductivity by improving soil structure. The intercrop may have improved soil water conservation because of their shading and better soil protection. The study demonstrated that conservation tillage with intercropping could effectively enhance soil hydraulic properties.

不同耕作和耕作制度对尼日利亚西南部热带钙质土壤憎水性和水力特性的影响
本研究考察了在尼日利亚西南部热带阿尔费索(Alfisol)地区,不同耕作制度下间作作物(在豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)和大豆(Glyxine max L.Merr)行间种植高粱(Sorghum, SOR (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench))对土壤理化性质、土壤吸水率(Sw)、导水性(K)和土壤疏水性(R)的影响。结果表明,在 2019 年的每个常规耕作(CT)、免耕(NT)和压实免耕系统(NTC)耕作系统下,耕作系统会对土壤 pH 值产生重大影响,但在 2020 年的耕作季节则不会。在研究结束时,三种耕作制度下的高粱-豇豆(SC)和高粱-大豆(SS)间作系统的土壤有机质(SOM)含量高于相应的单作高粱(SOR)。2019 年,各种植系统的土壤吸水率差异显著(p <0.001),并按照以下顺序排列:SC;SS;SOY;SOR;COW;而在 2020 年,三种耕作制度的平均吸水率平均值呈上升趋势,依次为:SOR(77.67 cm h)、SS(77.67 cm h)、SOY(77.67 cm h)、SOR(77.67 cm h)、COW(77.67 cm h):SOR(77.67 厘米/小时-1/2);COW(82.42 厘米/小时-1/2);SOY(88.00 厘米/小时-1/2);SS(88.73 厘米/小时-1/2);SC(98.29 厘米/小时-1/2)。总体而言,间作的 R 值低于单作。2019 年和 2020 年,NTC 土壤的疏水性分别比 NT 和 CT 土壤高 46.48% 和 56.39%;32.47% 和 41.67%。与豆科植物间作可能是钾含量较高的原因之一。土壤中的有机质可通过改善土壤结构来提高传导性。由于豆科植物的遮荫作用和更好的土壤保护作用,间作作物可能提高了土壤的保水性。研究表明,保护性耕作与间作可以有效提高土壤的水力特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信