Intratubular Penetration Depth of Ultrasound Activated Bioceramic Sealant Cements at the Dentin-Radicular Cement Interface

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marisa Jara Castro, Liliana Terán Casafranca, Freddy Ronald Valdez-Jurado, Martha Pineda, Doris Salcedo-Moncada, Frank Mayta-Tovalino
{"title":"Intratubular Penetration Depth of Ultrasound Activated Bioceramic Sealant Cements at the Dentin-Radicular Cement Interface","authors":"Marisa Jara Castro, Liliana Terán Casafranca, Freddy Ronald Valdez-Jurado, Martha Pineda, Doris Salcedo-Moncada, Frank Mayta-Tovalino","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2024.60004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the intratubular penetration depth of ultrasound-activated bioceramic sealant cements into root dentin, specifically at the dentin-cement interface. This in vitro experimental study was conducted with samples that were randomly divided based on the type of sealer used and whether ultrasound activation was applied prior to obturation. This resulted in four experimental groups (n=40). Groups A1 and B1 utilized the Eighteeth Ultra X ultrasonic activator with a blue tip #20 featuring a 2% taper at low power for activation, while groups A2 and B2 did not employ any form of activation. The symbol (+) denotes groups with ultrasonic activation, while (-) represents groups without ultrasonic activation. In the middle third, it was observed that BioC Sealer (+) had a mean sealing value of 0.66±0.17, while MTA Fillapex (+) showed a mean value of 0.38±0.07.  It was found that BioC Sealer (-) had a mean sealing value of 0.24±0.04 in the middle third, while MTA Fillapex (-) showed a mean value of 0.16±0.04. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.569). In the apical third, the BioC Sealer (-) presented a mean sealing value of 0.44±0.17, while the MTA Fillapex (-) obtained a mean value of 0.30±0.04. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0745), suggesting that both materials can provide a similar seal in the apical third. The results suggest that both BioC Sealer and MTA Fillapex provide a comparable seal in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal system, however, this was not statistically significant. This indicates their potential efficacy in both endodontic sealing procedures.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.60004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the intratubular penetration depth of ultrasound-activated bioceramic sealant cements into root dentin, specifically at the dentin-cement interface. This in vitro experimental study was conducted with samples that were randomly divided based on the type of sealer used and whether ultrasound activation was applied prior to obturation. This resulted in four experimental groups (n=40). Groups A1 and B1 utilized the Eighteeth Ultra X ultrasonic activator with a blue tip #20 featuring a 2% taper at low power for activation, while groups A2 and B2 did not employ any form of activation. The symbol (+) denotes groups with ultrasonic activation, while (-) represents groups without ultrasonic activation. In the middle third, it was observed that BioC Sealer (+) had a mean sealing value of 0.66±0.17, while MTA Fillapex (+) showed a mean value of 0.38±0.07.  It was found that BioC Sealer (-) had a mean sealing value of 0.24±0.04 in the middle third, while MTA Fillapex (-) showed a mean value of 0.16±0.04. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.569). In the apical third, the BioC Sealer (-) presented a mean sealing value of 0.44±0.17, while the MTA Fillapex (-) obtained a mean value of 0.30±0.04. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0745), suggesting that both materials can provide a similar seal in the apical third. The results suggest that both BioC Sealer and MTA Fillapex provide a comparable seal in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal system, however, this was not statistically significant. This indicates their potential efficacy in both endodontic sealing procedures.
超声波激活生物陶瓷密封胶在牙本质-牙槽骨粘结界面的管内渗透深度
评估超声激活的生物陶瓷封闭剂在牙本质内的管内渗透深度,特别是在牙本质-水泥界面处的渗透深度。这项体外实验研究根据所使用封闭剂的类型以及是否在封闭前使用超声波激活来随机划分样本。这样就产生了四个实验组(n=40)。A1 组和 B1 组使用 Eighteeth Ultra X 超声波激活器,其蓝色 20 号针尖具有 2% 的锥度,以低功率激活,而 A2 组和 B2 组未使用任何形式的激活。符号(+)表示使用超声波激活的组别,(-)表示未使用超声波激活的组别。在中间三分之一处,观察到 BioC Sealer(+)的平均密封值为 0.66±0.17,而 MTA Fillapex(+)的平均密封值为 0.38±0.07。 研究发现,BioC Sealer (-) 在中间三分之一处的平均密封值为 0.24±0.04,而 MTA Fillapex (-) 的平均密封值为 0.16±0.04。这些差异没有统计学意义(P=0.569)。在根尖三分之一处,BioC Sealer (-) 的平均封闭值为 0.44±0.17,而 MTA Fillapex (-) 的平均值为 0.30±0.04。然而,这一差异并没有达到统计学意义(P=0.0745),这表明两种材料都能在根尖三分之一处提供相似的封闭效果。结果表明,BioC Sealer 和 MTA Fillapex 都能在根管系统的中间和根尖三分之一处提供相似的密封效果,但这并不具有统计学意义。这表明它们在两种根管封闭程序中都具有潜在的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信