Treatment of Heartburn: A Survey of Ontario and Québec Community Pharmacists

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12030081
Nardine R. Nakhla, Sherilyn K. D. Houle, Jeffrey G. Taylor
{"title":"Treatment of Heartburn: A Survey of Ontario and Québec Community Pharmacists","authors":"Nardine R. Nakhla, Sherilyn K. D. Houle, Jeffrey G. Taylor","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12030081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The shift of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) from prescription to nonprescription (nonRx) status in Canada has altered pharmacist treatment options for heartburn. This report examines pharmacist approaches to therapy based on case severity; pharmacist confidence and consult duration were also explored. A 2022 online survey gathered data from Ontario and Québec pharmacists regarding their therapeutic approaches for two hypothetical heartburn cases. A total of 715 pharmacists participated, with most having 1–10 years of experience. In Ontario, common choices for the milder case included a solo histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (21.2%), combination H2RA + antacid (29.4%), and nonRx PPI (22.3%). For the more severe case, common choices for Québec were switches to nonRx H2RA (22.1%), combination H2RA + antacid (13.4%), a nonRx PPI (24.9%), or prescription PPI (22.5%). Pharmacists often recommended switching medications or referring patients with recurring symptoms after seven days. The approaches varied significantly between cases and provinces. The Ontario pharmacists favoured a combination H2RA + antacid for the milder case, while the Québec pharmacists preferred a solo H2RA. For the more severe case, both groups often chose nonRx H2RA followed by nonRx PPI. Despite the differences, the pharmacists demonstrated confidence in managing these situations. These findings highlight potential debates regarding optimal therapeutic approaches and the impact of drug scheduling on patient care.","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12030081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shift of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) from prescription to nonprescription (nonRx) status in Canada has altered pharmacist treatment options for heartburn. This report examines pharmacist approaches to therapy based on case severity; pharmacist confidence and consult duration were also explored. A 2022 online survey gathered data from Ontario and Québec pharmacists regarding their therapeutic approaches for two hypothetical heartburn cases. A total of 715 pharmacists participated, with most having 1–10 years of experience. In Ontario, common choices for the milder case included a solo histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (21.2%), combination H2RA + antacid (29.4%), and nonRx PPI (22.3%). For the more severe case, common choices for Québec were switches to nonRx H2RA (22.1%), combination H2RA + antacid (13.4%), a nonRx PPI (24.9%), or prescription PPI (22.5%). Pharmacists often recommended switching medications or referring patients with recurring symptoms after seven days. The approaches varied significantly between cases and provinces. The Ontario pharmacists favoured a combination H2RA + antacid for the milder case, while the Québec pharmacists preferred a solo H2RA. For the more severe case, both groups often chose nonRx H2RA followed by nonRx PPI. Despite the differences, the pharmacists demonstrated confidence in managing these situations. These findings highlight potential debates regarding optimal therapeutic approaches and the impact of drug scheduling on patient care.
治疗胃灼热:安大略省和魁北克省社区药剂师调查
质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 在加拿大从处方药转为非处方药后,改变了药剂师对胃灼热的治疗方案。本报告研究了药剂师根据病例严重程度采取的治疗方法;还探讨了药剂师的信心和咨询持续时间。2022 年进行的一项在线调查收集了安大略省和魁北克省药剂师的数据,了解他们对两种假设性胃灼热病例的治疗方法。共有 715 名药剂师参与了调查,其中大多数药剂师拥有 1-10 年的工作经验。在安大略省,较轻病例的常见选择包括单用组胺-2 受体拮抗剂 (H2RA)(21.2%)、H2RA + 抗酸剂组合(29.4%)和非处方 PPI(22.3%)。对于更严重的病例,魁北克常见的选择是改用非处方 H2RA(22.1%)、H2RA + 抗酸剂组合(13.4%)、非处方 PPI(24.9%)或处方 PPI(22.5%)。药剂师通常建议更换药物或转诊七天后症状复发的患者。不同病例和不同省份的药剂师采用的方法大相径庭。对于较轻的病例,安大略省的药剂师倾向于联合使用 H2RA + 抗酸剂,而魁北克省的药剂师则倾向于单独使用 H2RA。对于较严重的病例,两组药剂师通常都选择非处方 H2RA,然后是非处方 PPI。尽管存在差异,但药剂师在处理这些情况时表现出了信心。这些发现凸显了有关最佳治疗方法和药物配伍对患者护理影响的潜在争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信