BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON GREEN BUILDING ASSESSMENT METHOD BY CITESPACE AND HISTCITE

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yuanyuan Li, Ying Wang, Rui Wang, Chunlu Liu, Zhigang Zhang
{"title":"BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON GREEN BUILDING ASSESSMENT METHOD BY CITESPACE AND HISTCITE","authors":"Yuanyuan Li, Ying Wang, Rui Wang, Chunlu Liu, Zhigang Zhang","doi":"10.3846/ijspm.2024.21455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous qualitative review studies have been conducted to enhance the understanding of current research status of green buildings (GBs). Green building assessment methods (GBAMs) are crucial to the development of GBs and relevant research works has received wide attention. However, there are very few reviews to quantitively explore these studies. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically review literatures on GBAMs, and visually analyzes them through CiteSpace and HistCite. The article identified the most influential journals, contributors, representative institutions and regions. The knowledge bases of this area focus on “triple bottom line”, “indicator”, “building design”, “life cycle costing”, “life cycle sustainability assessment”, “tropical climate”, “building information modelling” and “Chinese green building label”. Through citation analysis, “updating existing GBAMs by scheme comparison”, “updating existing GBAMs by GB case analysis”, “establishment of new GBAMs” and “incorporation of BIM in GBAMs” were found as the main research themes. “Design”, “LCA”, “model”, “energy”, “management”, “residential buildings” and “office buildings” are high-frequency keywords. Future research directions were finally proposed as “more investigation on the other types of GBs”, “incorporation of cost-related criteria”, “enhancing health-related indicators” and“integrating with BIM technology”. The results could provide a useful reference to industry practitioners and scholars interested in GBAMs.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2024.21455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous qualitative review studies have been conducted to enhance the understanding of current research status of green buildings (GBs). Green building assessment methods (GBAMs) are crucial to the development of GBs and relevant research works has received wide attention. However, there are very few reviews to quantitively explore these studies. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically review literatures on GBAMs, and visually analyzes them through CiteSpace and HistCite. The article identified the most influential journals, contributors, representative institutions and regions. The knowledge bases of this area focus on “triple bottom line”, “indicator”, “building design”, “life cycle costing”, “life cycle sustainability assessment”, “tropical climate”, “building information modelling” and “Chinese green building label”. Through citation analysis, “updating existing GBAMs by scheme comparison”, “updating existing GBAMs by GB case analysis”, “establishment of new GBAMs” and “incorporation of BIM in GBAMs” were found as the main research themes. “Design”, “LCA”, “model”, “energy”, “management”, “residential buildings” and “office buildings” are high-frequency keywords. Future research directions were finally proposed as “more investigation on the other types of GBs”, “incorporation of cost-related criteria”, “enhancing health-related indicators” and“integrating with BIM technology”. The results could provide a useful reference to industry practitioners and scholars interested in GBAMs.
citespace 和 histcite 对绿色建筑评估方法研究的文献计量学审查
为了更好地了解绿色建筑(GBs)的研究现状,已经开展了大量的定性综述研究。绿色建筑评估方法(GBAMs)对绿色建筑的发展至关重要,相关研究工作也受到广泛关注。然而,很少有综述对这些研究进行量化探讨。因此,本文旨在系统回顾有关 GBAMs 的文献,并通过 CiteSpace 和 HistCite 对其进行直观分析。文章确定了最有影响力的期刊、投稿人、代表性机构和地区。该领域的知识库主要集中在 "三重底线"、"指标"、"建筑设计"、"生命周期成本核算"、"生命周期可持续性评估"、"热带气候"、"建筑信息模型 "和 "中国绿色建筑标识 "等方面。通过引文分析,"通过方案比较更新现有的 GBAMs"、"通过 GB 案例分析更新现有的 GBAMs"、"建立新的 GBAMs "和 "将 BIM 纳入 GBAMs "是主要的研究主题。"设计"、"生命周期评估"、"模型"、"能源"、"管理"、"住宅建筑 "和 "办公建筑 "是高频关键词。最后提出的未来研究方向包括 "更多调查其他类型的国标"、"纳入成本相关标准"、"加强健康相关指标 "和 "与 BIM 技术相结合"。研究结果可为对 GBAM 有兴趣的行业从业人员和学者提供有益的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信