Treading water: new data on the impact of AI ethics information sessions in classics and ancient language pedagogy

IF 0.2 N/A CLASSICS
Edward A. S. Ross, Jackie Baines
{"title":"Treading water: new data on the impact of AI ethics information sessions in classics and ancient language pedagogy","authors":"Edward A. S. Ross, Jackie Baines","doi":"10.1017/s2058631024000412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over 2023, many universities and policy organisations in the higher education (HE) sector are working to create guiding principles and guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in HE Teaching and Learning (T&L). Despite these guidelines, students remain unsure if and how they should use AI. This article discusses the AI information sessions held over the Autumn 2023 term in the Department of Classics at the University of Reading, which aimed to provide students with the knowledge and tools to make informed judgements about using AI in their studies. These sessions discussed the benefits and drawbacks of generative AI, highlighting training data, content policy, environmental impact, and examples of potential uses. Staff and student participants were surveyed before and after these information sessions to gather their opinions surrounding AI use. Although at least 60% of participants had previously used generative AI, 80% of participants were apprehensive of or against using generative AI tools for learning purposes following the AI information sessions. By providing staff and students with the ethical considerations surrounding generative AI, they can make an informed judgement about using AI in their work without misplaced faith or excessive fear.","PeriodicalId":53809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classics Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classics Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2058631024000412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over 2023, many universities and policy organisations in the higher education (HE) sector are working to create guiding principles and guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in HE Teaching and Learning (T&L). Despite these guidelines, students remain unsure if and how they should use AI. This article discusses the AI information sessions held over the Autumn 2023 term in the Department of Classics at the University of Reading, which aimed to provide students with the knowledge and tools to make informed judgements about using AI in their studies. These sessions discussed the benefits and drawbacks of generative AI, highlighting training data, content policy, environmental impact, and examples of potential uses. Staff and student participants were surveyed before and after these information sessions to gather their opinions surrounding AI use. Although at least 60% of participants had previously used generative AI, 80% of participants were apprehensive of or against using generative AI tools for learning purposes following the AI information sessions. By providing staff and students with the ethical considerations surrounding generative AI, they can make an informed judgement about using AI in their work without misplaced faith or excessive fear.
踩水:关于人工智能伦理信息会议在古典和古代语言教学法中的影响的新数据
2023 年,高等教育(HE)领域的许多大学和政策组织都在努力制定在高等教育教学(T&L)中使用生成式人工智能(AI)的指导原则和指南。尽管有这些指导原则,但学生们仍然不确定是否应该使用人工智能以及如何使用。本文讨论了 2023 年秋季学期在雷丁大学古典学系举行的人工智能信息交流会,其目的是为学生提供知识和工具,以便他们在学习中对使用人工智能做出明智的判断。这些课程讨论了生成式人工智能的优点和缺点,重点介绍了训练数据、内容政策、环境影响和潜在用途实例。在这些信息交流会前后,我们对教职员工和学生参与者进行了调查,以收集他们对使用人工智能的看法。虽然至少有 60% 的参与者以前使用过人工智能生成工具,但在人工智能信息交流会之后,80% 的参与者对将人工智能生成工具用于学习目的表示担忧或反对。通过向教职员工和学生提供有关生成式人工智能的伦理考虑因素,他们可以对在工作中使用人工智能做出明智的判断,而不会错误地相信或过度恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信