Yield Gap Analysis of Common Bean through On-Farm Demonstrations in Central Rift Valley (CRV) of Ethiopia

Belay Roba, Fistum Miruts
{"title":"Yield Gap Analysis of Common Bean through On-Farm Demonstrations in Central Rift Valley (CRV) of Ethiopia","authors":"Belay Roba, Fistum Miruts","doi":"10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i7679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study proposes to analyze the yield gap of common bean varieties through on-farm demonstrations in the central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. The districts were purposefully selected based on their common bean production potential. A total of sixteen (16) trial farmers were selected from potential haricot bean-growing kebeles. Two improved common bean varieties, SAB-632 and SAB-736, and one standard check (Nasir) were planted on a plot size of 0.125ha. The result shows the highest mean yield was 26 qt/ha for SAB-632 in Shalla, followed by (24.4 qt/ha) at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district. The increase in productivity of SAB-632 at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha and Adama district over respective standard checks was 20.35 % and 51.5 % respectively. The mean extension gap was 5.7 qt/ha in SAB-632, while -1.07 qt/ha was in SAB-736 variety. In addition the mean technology index was 7.7 % in the SAB-736, while it was 32 % for SAB-736 varieties. Across all locations, SAB-632 varieties have a technology index of less than 15 % indicating that their performance by these varieties in those district conditions was more than satisfactory. There is a need to adopt and scale up SAB-632 on a larger scale to enhance the adoption of variety.","PeriodicalId":505193,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","volume":"11 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i7679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes to analyze the yield gap of common bean varieties through on-farm demonstrations in the central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. The districts were purposefully selected based on their common bean production potential. A total of sixteen (16) trial farmers were selected from potential haricot bean-growing kebeles. Two improved common bean varieties, SAB-632 and SAB-736, and one standard check (Nasir) were planted on a plot size of 0.125ha. The result shows the highest mean yield was 26 qt/ha for SAB-632 in Shalla, followed by (24.4 qt/ha) at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district. The increase in productivity of SAB-632 at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha and Adama district over respective standard checks was 20.35 % and 51.5 % respectively. The mean extension gap was 5.7 qt/ha in SAB-632, while -1.07 qt/ha was in SAB-736 variety. In addition the mean technology index was 7.7 % in the SAB-736, while it was 32 % for SAB-736 varieties. Across all locations, SAB-632 varieties have a technology index of less than 15 % indicating that their performance by these varieties in those district conditions was more than satisfactory. There is a need to adopt and scale up SAB-632 on a larger scale to enhance the adoption of variety.
通过埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷(CRV)的农田示范分析普通豆类的产量差距
本研究拟通过在埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷的农场示范,分析普通豆类品种的产量差距。这些地区是根据其普通豆类生产潜力特意选定的。从可能种植哈密瓜的kebeles中挑选了十六(16)名试验农民。在 0.125 公顷的地块上种植了两个改良普通豆品种 SAB-632 和 SAB-736,以及一个标准对照(Nasir)。结果表明,SAB-632 在 Shalla 的平均产量最高,为 26 千克/公顷,其次是 Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha 地区(24.4 千克/公顷)。在阿达米-图鲁-吉多-孔博尔查和阿达玛地区,SAB-632 的产量比各自的标准对照分别提高了 20.35 % 和 51.5 %。SAB-632 的平均扩展差距为 5.7 qt/ha,而 SAB-736 品种为-1.07 qt/ha。此外,SAB-736 的平均技术指数为 7.7%,而 SAB-736 品种为 32%。在所有地点,SAB-632 品种的技术指数均低于 15%,表明这些品种在这些地区条件下的表现非常令人满意。有必要在更大范围内采用和推广 SAB-632,以提高品种的采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信