Reliability of information in YouTube™ videos on types of root resorption and related stimulating factors

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Dental Traumatology Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1111/edt.12970

Gülçin Cagay Sevencan, Hande Erener

{"title":"Reliability of information in YouTube™ videos on types of root resorption and related stimulating factors","authors":"Gülçin Cagay Sevencan, Hande Erener","doi":"10.1111/edt.12970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Root resorption occurs for various reasons and can also be seen as a treatment complication in orthodontics. This study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos on root resorption and to assess whether the videos referred to orthodontic treatment and other stimulation factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>YouTube was searched using the keyword ‘root resorption’, which is the most searched term on Google Trends. The first 200 videos identified using the default filter ‘sort by relevance’ were used. Information such as the source, type, duration, and number of likes were recorded. Videos were analyzed using a 23-point content scale related to root resorption and divided into groups (poor, moderate, and excellent) based on the Global Quality Score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 95 videos were included in the study. Most were uploaded by dentists or dental clinics (<i>n</i> = 64, 67.4%). The mean number of days since upload was 1536 ± 1254, and the mean duration was 5 ± 4 min. The videos had a mean of 80 ± 515 likes and 7043 ± 35,382 views, and a mean viewing rate of 1131.71 ± 8736.83. The most discussed topic was radiographic signs of root resorption. While the highest content score for the videos was 21, the average score was only 4. The mean GQS was 2 ± 1. Grouping videos by GQS showed that 55 (57.9%) were poor, 38 (40%) were moderate, and 2 (2.1%) were excellent. There was a significant relationship between videos that mentioned orthodontics (<i>n</i> = 62; 65.3%) and higher GQS (<i>p</i> = .036), and a significant difference was between GQS groups for total content levels (<i>p</i> < .001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>YouTube videos related to root resorption lack sufficient information and clarity, and their quality needs to be improved. Oral health professionals should strive to produce higher-quality videos.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":"40 6","pages":"712-721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edt.12970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim

Root resorption occurs for various reasons and can also be seen as a treatment complication in orthodontics. This study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos on root resorption and to assess whether the videos referred to orthodontic treatment and other stimulation factors.

Materials and Methods

YouTube was searched using the keyword ‘root resorption’, which is the most searched term on Google Trends. The first 200 videos identified using the default filter ‘sort by relevance’ were used. Information such as the source, type, duration, and number of likes were recorded. Videos were analyzed using a 23-point content scale related to root resorption and divided into groups (poor, moderate, and excellent) based on the Global Quality Score.

Results

A total of 95 videos were included in the study. Most were uploaded by dentists or dental clinics (n = 64, 67.4%). The mean number of days since upload was 1536 ± 1254, and the mean duration was 5 ± 4 min. The videos had a mean of 80 ± 515 likes and 7043 ± 35,382 views, and a mean viewing rate of 1131.71 ± 8736.83. The most discussed topic was radiographic signs of root resorption. While the highest content score for the videos was 21, the average score was only 4. The mean GQS was 2 ± 1. Grouping videos by GQS showed that 55 (57.9%) were poor, 38 (40%) were moderate, and 2 (2.1%) were excellent. There was a significant relationship between videos that mentioned orthodontics (n = 62; 65.3%) and higher GQS (p = .036), and a significant difference was between GQS groups for total content levels (p < .001).

Conclusions

YouTube videos related to root resorption lack sufficient information and clarity, and their quality needs to be improved. Oral health professionals should strive to produce higher-quality videos.

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube™ 视频中有关牙根吸收类型和相关刺激因素的信息的可靠性。

背景/目的：牙根吸收的发生有多种原因，也可被视为正畸治疗的并发症。本研究旨在评估 YouTube™ 上有关牙根吸收的视频的可靠性和质量，并评估这些视频是否涉及正畸治疗和其他刺激因素：使用关键字 "牙根吸收 "搜索 YouTube，这是 Google Trends 上搜索次数最多的词。使用默认过滤器 "按相关性排序 "确定前 200 个视频。记录了视频的来源、类型、持续时间和点赞数等信息。使用与牙根吸收相关的 23 点内容量表对视频进行分析，并根据全局质量得分将视频分为三组（差、中、优）：共有 95 个视频被纳入研究。大部分视频由牙医或牙科诊所上传（64 个，占 67.4%）。平均上传天数为 1536 ± 1254 天，平均持续时间为 5 ± 4 分钟。这些视频的平均点赞数为 80 ± 515，平均浏览数为 7043 ± 35382，平均观看率为 1131.71 ± 8736.83。讨论最多的话题是牙根吸收的放射学迹象。虽然视频内容的最高得分是 21 分，但平均得分仅为 4 分，平均 GQS 为 2 ± 1。根据 GQS 对视频进行分组显示，55 个视频（57.9%）为差，38 个视频（40%）为中，2 个视频（2.1%）为优。提及牙齿矫正的视频（n = 62；65.3%）与较高的 GQS 之间存在明显关系（p = .036），GQS 组之间的总内容水平也存在明显差异（p 结论：GQS 组与 GQS 组之间存在明显差异（p 结论：GQS 组与 GQS 组之间存在明显差异（p 结论：GQS 组与 GQS 组之间存在明显差异）：与牙根吸收相关的 YouTube 视频缺乏足够的信息和清晰度，其质量有待提高。口腔卫生专业人员应努力制作更高质量的视频。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

32.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.