Interactions between ENDS and cigarette use: evidence from a 2022 national telephone survey in South Africa.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kirsten van der Zee, Corné Van Walbeek
{"title":"Interactions between ENDS and cigarette use: evidence from a 2022 national telephone survey in South Africa.","authors":"Kirsten van der Zee, Corné Van Walbeek","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may serve as a cessation tool for people who smoke cigarettes. However, for people who do not smoke, ENDS may be a gateway to nicotine addiction and cigarette use. This paper aims to quantify these behaviours in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed a nationally representative telephone survey of 21 263 South Africans living in urban areas. For those respondents who had used both products (N=771), we developed a typology that describes the sequence in which cigarette and ENDS initiation occurred. 'On-rampers' describe people who used ENDS first and later initiated cigarette smoking. 'Off-rampers' describe people who used cigarettes first, took up ENDS and later quit cigarettes while still using ENDS. 'Failed off-rampers' describe people who started using ENDS while smoking cigarettes but later quit using ENDS. 'Continuing dual consumers' describe people still using both products at the time of the interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the overall sample (N=21 263), 1.7% used or had used ENDS but had no history of using cigarettes. Of dual consumers (N=771), 8.8% were classified as 'on-rampers', 13.9% as 'off-rampers', 20.9% as 'failed off-rampers' and 56.4% as 'continuing dual consumers'. Roughly half of those classified as off-rampers, failed off-rampers or continuing dual consumers stated that they started using ENDS to help them quit cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The typology reveals a multifaceted relationship between ENDS and cigarette use in South Africa. Policy interventions should aim to minimise on-ramping and maximise off-ramping. Given the high prevalence of continued dual use and failed off-ramping, targeted cessation support should be provided for people who use ENDS and are trying to quit cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may serve as a cessation tool for people who smoke cigarettes. However, for people who do not smoke, ENDS may be a gateway to nicotine addiction and cigarette use. This paper aims to quantify these behaviours in South Africa.

Methods: We analysed a nationally representative telephone survey of 21 263 South Africans living in urban areas. For those respondents who had used both products (N=771), we developed a typology that describes the sequence in which cigarette and ENDS initiation occurred. 'On-rampers' describe people who used ENDS first and later initiated cigarette smoking. 'Off-rampers' describe people who used cigarettes first, took up ENDS and later quit cigarettes while still using ENDS. 'Failed off-rampers' describe people who started using ENDS while smoking cigarettes but later quit using ENDS. 'Continuing dual consumers' describe people still using both products at the time of the interview.

Results: Of the overall sample (N=21 263), 1.7% used or had used ENDS but had no history of using cigarettes. Of dual consumers (N=771), 8.8% were classified as 'on-rampers', 13.9% as 'off-rampers', 20.9% as 'failed off-rampers' and 56.4% as 'continuing dual consumers'. Roughly half of those classified as off-rampers, failed off-rampers or continuing dual consumers stated that they started using ENDS to help them quit cigarettes.

Conclusions: The typology reveals a multifaceted relationship between ENDS and cigarette use in South Africa. Policy interventions should aim to minimise on-ramping and maximise off-ramping. Given the high prevalence of continued dual use and failed off-ramping, targeted cessation support should be provided for people who use ENDS and are trying to quit cigarettes.

ENDS 与香烟使用之间的相互作用:来自 2022 年南非全国电话调查的证据。
导言:电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)可作为吸烟者的戒烟工具。然而,对于不吸烟的人来说,电子尼古丁递送系统可能会成为尼古丁成瘾和使用香烟的途径。本文旨在量化南非的这些行为:我们分析了一项具有全国代表性的电话调查,调查对象为 21 263 名居住在城市地区的南非人。对于使用过这两种产品的受访者(771 人),我们进行了分类,描述了开始使用香烟和 ENDS 的先后顺序。On-rampers "指的是先使用ENDS,然后开始吸烟的人。非跃进者 "是指先使用香烟,后开始使用ENDS,之后在仍使用ENDS的情况下戒烟的人。失败的偏离者 "指的是开始使用ENDS的同时吸烟,但后来戒烟的人。持续双重消费者 "是指在接受访谈时仍在使用这两种产品的人:在总体样本(样本数=21263)中,1.7%的人使用或曾经使用过ENDS,但没有使用香烟的历史。在双重消费者(样本数=771)中,8.8%的人被归类为 "正在使用",13.9%的人被归类为 "不再使用",20.9%的人被归类为 "不再使用",56.4%的人被归类为 "持续双重消费者"。在被归类为 "不吸烟者"、"不吸烟失败者 "或 "持续双重消费者 "的人群中,约有一半人表示,他们开始使用ENDS是为了帮助自己戒烟:该类型学揭示了ENDS与南非香烟使用之间的多方面关系。政策干预的目标应该是最大限度地减少 "上瘾",最大限度地减少 "下瘾"。鉴于继续双重使用和停止使用的情况非常普遍,应该为使用 ENDS 并试图戒烟的人提供有针对性的戒烟支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信