Quality improvement project to improve adherence to lung protective ventilation guidelines.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Adam Harriman, Katrina Butler, Dhruv Parekh, Jonathan Weblin
{"title":"Quality improvement project to improve adherence to lung protective ventilation guidelines.","authors":"Adam Harriman, Katrina Butler, Dhruv Parekh, Jonathan Weblin","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung protective ventilation (LPV) is advocated for all patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), for any duration of time, to prevent worsening lung injury. Previous studies proved simple interventions can increase awareness of LPV and disease pathophysiology as well as improve adherence to LPV guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of a multi-component LPV quality improvement project (QIP) on adherence to LPV guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tidal volume data for all patients requiring MV at a large, tertiary UK critical care unit were collected retrospectively over 3, 6 months, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles between September 2019 and August 2022. These cycles included the sequential implementation of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and targeted education led by a multispecialty working group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Adherence against predetermined targets of <5% of MV hours spent at >10 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and >75% of MV hours spent <8 mL/kg PBW for all patients requiring MV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>408 949 hours (17 040 days) of MV data were analysed. Improved LPV adherence was demonstrated throughout the QIP. During mandated MV, time spent >10 mL/kg PBW reduced from 7.65% of MV hours to 4.04% and time spent <8 mL/kg PBW improved from 68.86% of MV hours to 71.87% following the QIP. During spontaneous MV, adherence improved with a reduction in time spent >10 mL/kg PBW from baseline to completion (13.2% vs 6.75%) with increased time spent <8 mL/kg PBW (62.74% vs 72.25%). Despite demonstrating improvements in adherence, we were unable to achieve success in all our predetermined targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicomponent intervention including the use of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and education improves adherence to LPV guidelines. More robust data analysis of reasons for non-adherence to our predetermined targets is required to guide future interventions that may allow further improvement in adherence to LPV guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung protective ventilation (LPV) is advocated for all patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), for any duration of time, to prevent worsening lung injury. Previous studies proved simple interventions can increase awareness of LPV and disease pathophysiology as well as improve adherence to LPV guidelines.

Objective: To assess the impact of a multi-component LPV quality improvement project (QIP) on adherence to LPV guidelines.

Methods: Tidal volume data for all patients requiring MV at a large, tertiary UK critical care unit were collected retrospectively over 3, 6 months, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles between September 2019 and August 2022. These cycles included the sequential implementation of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and targeted education led by a multispecialty working group.

Main outcome measure: Adherence against predetermined targets of <5% of MV hours spent at >10 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and >75% of MV hours spent <8 mL/kg PBW for all patients requiring MV.

Results: 408 949 hours (17 040 days) of MV data were analysed. Improved LPV adherence was demonstrated throughout the QIP. During mandated MV, time spent >10 mL/kg PBW reduced from 7.65% of MV hours to 4.04% and time spent <8 mL/kg PBW improved from 68.86% of MV hours to 71.87% following the QIP. During spontaneous MV, adherence improved with a reduction in time spent >10 mL/kg PBW from baseline to completion (13.2% vs 6.75%) with increased time spent <8 mL/kg PBW (62.74% vs 72.25%). Despite demonstrating improvements in adherence, we were unable to achieve success in all our predetermined targets.

Conclusion: This multicomponent intervention including the use of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and education improves adherence to LPV guidelines. More robust data analysis of reasons for non-adherence to our predetermined targets is required to guide future interventions that may allow further improvement in adherence to LPV guidelines.

改善肺保护性通气指南遵守情况的质量改进项目。
导言:肺保护性通气(LPV)适用于所有需要机械通气(MV)的患者,无论通气时间长短,以防止肺损伤恶化。以往的研究证明,简单的干预措施可以提高人们对肺保护通气和疾病病理生理学的认识,并改善对肺保护通气指南的遵守情况:目的:评估由多部分组成的 LPV 质量改进项目(QIP)对遵守 LPV 指南的影响:在2019年9月至2022年8月期间,对英国一家大型三级重症监护病房所有需要MV的患者的潮气量数据进行了3个月的回顾性收集。这些周期包括依次实施 LPV 报告、床旁白板和由多专科工作组领导的有针对性的教育:主要结果衡量指标:是否遵守 10 毫升/千克预测体重(PBW)和 >75% MV 小时的预定目标:分析了 408 949 小时(17 040 天)的 MV 数据。在整个 QIP 期间,LPV 的依从性得到了改善。在强制 MV 期间,>10 毫升/千克 PBW 的用药时间从 7.65% 的 MV 小时减少到 4.04%,10 毫升/千克 PBW 的用药时间从基线到完成(13.2% 对 6.75%),用药时间增加 结论:这种多成分干预措施包括使用 LPV 报告、床旁白板和教育,可提高对 LPV 指南的依从性。我们需要对未遵守预定目标的原因进行更有力的数据分析,以指导未来的干预措施,从而进一步改善对 LPV 指南的遵守情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信