Interpretable software estimation with graph neural networks and orthogonal array tunning method

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Nevena Rankovic , Dragica Rankovic , Mirjana Ivanovic , Jelena Kaljevic
{"title":"Interpretable software estimation with graph neural networks and orthogonal array tunning method","authors":"Nevena Rankovic ,&nbsp;Dragica Rankovic ,&nbsp;Mirjana Ivanovic ,&nbsp;Jelena Kaljevic","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Software estimation rates are still suboptimal regarding efficiency, runtime, and the accuracy of model predictions. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are complex, yet their precise forecasting reduces the gap between expected and actual software development efforts, thereby minimizing associated risks. However, defining optimal hyperparameter configurations remains a challenge. This paper compares state-of-the-art models such as Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM), Graph Gated Neural Networks (GGNN), and Graph Gated Sequence Neural Networks (GGSNN), and conducts experiments with various hyperparameter settings to optimize performance. We also aim to gain the most informative feedback from our models by exploring insights using a post-hoc agnostic method like Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Our findings indicate that the Taguchi orthogonal array optimization method is the most computationally efficient, yielding notably improved performance metrics. This suggests a compromise between computational efficiency and prediction accuracy while still requiring the lowest number of runnings, with an RMSE of 0.9211 and an MAE of 310.4. For the best-performing model, the GGSNN model, within the Constructive Cost Model (COCOMO), Function Point Analysis (FPA), and Use Case Points (UCP) frameworks, applying the SHAP method leads to a more accurate determination of relevance, as evidenced by the norm reduction in activation vectors. The SHAP method stands out by exhibiting the smallest area under the curve and faster convergence, indicating its efficiency in pinpointing concept relevance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324001389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software estimation rates are still suboptimal regarding efficiency, runtime, and the accuracy of model predictions. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are complex, yet their precise forecasting reduces the gap between expected and actual software development efforts, thereby minimizing associated risks. However, defining optimal hyperparameter configurations remains a challenge. This paper compares state-of-the-art models such as Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM), Graph Gated Neural Networks (GGNN), and Graph Gated Sequence Neural Networks (GGSNN), and conducts experiments with various hyperparameter settings to optimize performance. We also aim to gain the most informative feedback from our models by exploring insights using a post-hoc agnostic method like Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Our findings indicate that the Taguchi orthogonal array optimization method is the most computationally efficient, yielding notably improved performance metrics. This suggests a compromise between computational efficiency and prediction accuracy while still requiring the lowest number of runnings, with an RMSE of 0.9211 and an MAE of 310.4. For the best-performing model, the GGSNN model, within the Constructive Cost Model (COCOMO), Function Point Analysis (FPA), and Use Case Points (UCP) frameworks, applying the SHAP method leads to a more accurate determination of relevance, as evidenced by the norm reduction in activation vectors. The SHAP method stands out by exhibiting the smallest area under the curve and faster convergence, indicating its efficiency in pinpointing concept relevance.

利用图神经网络和正交阵列调谐法进行可解释软件估算
在效率、运行时间和模型预测的准确性方面,软件估算率仍未达到最佳水平。图神经网络(GNN)非常复杂,但它的精确预测可以缩小预期与实际软件开发工作量之间的差距,从而最大限度地降低相关风险。然而,确定最佳超参数配置仍然是一项挑战。本文比较了长短期记忆(LSTM)、图门控神经网络(GGNN)和图门控序列神经网络(GGSNN)等最先进的模型,并进行了各种超参数设置实验,以优化性能。我们的目标还包括通过使用 Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) 等事后不可知方法来探索洞察力,从而从模型中获得最翔实的反馈信息。我们的研究结果表明,田口正交阵列优化方法的计算效率最高,性能指标明显改善。这表明在计算效率和预测准确性之间达成了折衷,同时所需的运行次数仍然最少,RMSE 为 0.9211,MAE 为 310.4。对于构造成本模型 (COCOMO)、功能点分析 (FPA) 和用例点 (UCP) 框架中表现最好的 GGSNN 模型,应用 SHAP 方法可以更准确地确定相关性,激活向量的规范减少就是证明。SHAP 方法的突出特点是曲线下面积最小,收敛速度更快,这表明它在精确定位概念相关性方面非常高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信