Lessons from a Neo-Aristotelian Theory Based on Evolutionary Science to the Field of Organizational Innovation.

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1007/s12124-024-09845-9

Flavio Osmo, Maryana Madeira Borri

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article's goal is to understand innovation factors (e.g., job autonomy and knowledge sharing) through the lens of a neo-Aristotelian theory based on evolutionary science in order to show that this paradigm of analysis provides a richer understanding of this organizational phenomenon, and consequently better support for the deliberation on what measures to implement when the objective is to make the organization prone to innovate.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于进化科学的新亚里士多德理论对组织创新领域的启示。

本文的目标是通过基于进化科学的新亚里士多德理论来理解创新因素（如工作自主权和知识共享），以表明这种分析范式能提供对这一组织现象的更丰富的理解，从而更好地支持在以组织创新为目标时考虑采取何种措施。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Psychology-Social Psychology

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science is an international interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of basic knowledge in the social and behavioral sciences. IPBS covers such topics as cultural nature of human conduct and its evolutionary history, anthropology, ethology, communication processes between people, and within-- as well as between-- societies. A special focus will be given to integration of perspectives of the social and biological sciences through theoretical models of epigenesis. It contains articles pertaining to theoretical integration of ideas, epistemology of social and biological sciences, and original empirical research articles of general scientific value. History of the social sciences is covered by IPBS in cases relevant for further development of theoretical perspectives and empirical elaborations within the social and biological sciences. IPBS has the goal of integrating knowledge from different areas into a new synthesis of universal social science—overcoming the post-modernist fragmentation of ideas of recent decades.