Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without renal dysfunction.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Minerva cardiology and angiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06510-4
Kenichi Matsushita, Kazumasa Harada, Takashi Kohno, Hiroki Nakano, Daisuke Kitano, Junya Matsuda, Hideaki Yoshino, Takeshi Yamamoto, Ken Nagao, Morimasa Takayama
{"title":"Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without renal dysfunction.","authors":"Kenichi Matsushita, Kazumasa Harada, Takashi Kohno, Hiroki Nakano, Daisuke Kitano, Junya Matsuda, Hideaki Yoshino, Takeshi Yamamoto, Ken Nagao, Morimasa Takayama","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06510-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with renal dysfunction (RD) is considered to be a specific phenotype of HFpEF. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality between HFpEF-diagnosed patients with and without RD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 5867 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. RD was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the in-hospital mortality between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the study cohort, 68% of patients had RD. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in HFpEF patients with RD than in those without RD. The comorbidities and laboratory data differed significantly between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in the HFpEF patients with RD were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.991), eGFR (HR, 0.981), C-reactive protein (CRP; HR, 1.028), diuretics (HR, 0.374), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARBs; HR, 0.680), and beta-blockers (HR, 0.662). In HFpEF patients without RD, age (HR, 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.979), and ACE-I/ARBs (HR, 0.373) were independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors, such as CRP and beta-blockers, were observed between the HFpEF patients with and without RD. These results have implications for future research and may help guide individualized patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":" ","pages":"615-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06510-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with renal dysfunction (RD) is considered to be a specific phenotype of HFpEF. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality between HFpEF-diagnosed patients with and without RD.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 5867 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. RD was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the in-hospital mortality between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors.

Results: Across the study cohort, 68% of patients had RD. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in HFpEF patients with RD than in those without RD. The comorbidities and laboratory data differed significantly between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in the HFpEF patients with RD were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.991), eGFR (HR, 0.981), C-reactive protein (CRP; HR, 1.028), diuretics (HR, 0.374), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARBs; HR, 0.680), and beta-blockers (HR, 0.662). In HFpEF patients without RD, age (HR, 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.979), and ACE-I/ARBs (HR, 0.373) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions: Significant differences in the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors, such as CRP and beta-blockers, were observed between the HFpEF patients with and without RD. These results have implications for future research and may help guide individualized patient management strategies.

有肾功能障碍和无肾功能障碍的射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者的临床特征和预后因素比较。
背景:射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)伴肾功能障碍(RD)被认为是HFpEF的一种特殊表型。本研究旨在比较确诊为 HFpEF 且伴有和不伴有 RD 的患者的临床特征和院内死亡率的预后因素:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了 5867 例急性 HFpEF 连续患者。RD的定义是估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为2。研究采用卡普兰-米尔生存曲线和对数秩检验比较两组患者的院内死亡率。进行了单变量和多变量考克斯回归分析,以确定重要的预后因素:在整个研究队列中,68%的患者患有RD。有RD的高频血友病患者的院内死亡率明显高于无RD的患者。两组患者的合并症和实验室数据差异显著。有RD的HFpEF患者院内死亡率的独立预后因素是年龄(危险比[HR],1.039)、收缩压(HR,0.991)、eGFR(HR,0.981)、C反应蛋白(CRP;HR,1.028)、利尿剂(HR,0.374)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ACE-I/ARBs;HR,0.680)和β-受体阻滞剂(HR,0.662)。在无RD的HFpEF患者中,年龄(HR,1.039)、收缩压(HR,0.979)和ACE-I/ARBs(HR,0.373)是独立的预后因素:有 RD 和无 RD 的 HFpEF 患者在临床特征和预后因素(如 CRP 和β-受体阻滞剂)方面存在显著差异。这些结果对未来的研究具有启示意义,有助于指导个体化的患者管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信