Randomized Controlled Trial on Imaginal Retraining for Problematic Alcohol Use: A Dismantling Study

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Josefine Gehlenborg, Anja S. Göritz, Joana Kempken, Janina Wirtz, Lea Schuurmans, Steffen Moritz, Simone Kühn
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial on Imaginal Retraining for Problematic Alcohol Use: A Dismantling Study","authors":"Josefine Gehlenborg,&nbsp;Anja S. Göritz,&nbsp;Joana Kempken,&nbsp;Janina Wirtz,&nbsp;Lea Schuurmans,&nbsp;Steffen Moritz,&nbsp;Simone Kühn","doi":"10.1002/cpp.3010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Imaginal retraining (IR) is an approach-avoidance procedure that has shown promising results in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to dismantle the efficacy of IR's components in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We conducted a RCT with nine conditions comprising eight intervention groups and a waitlist control group (WLC). Alcohol craving (primary outcome), consumption, depressive symptoms, quality of life, subjective appraisal, and side effects were assessed online at baseline, post intervention (6 weeks), and follow-up (12 weeks). The sample consisted of 426 participants (age: <i>M</i> = 47.22, <i>SD</i> = 11.82, women: 50.5%). The intervention groups received instructions for four different components of IR (mood induction, mental avoidance of unhealthy stimuli, motor avoidance of unhealthy stimuli, approach to healthy stimuli) that were each conveyed with or without prior psychoeducation (PE). The intervention was delivered online. At total of 163 individuals (42.9%) used the intervention at least once. No group differences were found for any primary or secondary outcome after Šidák correction. Uncorrected statistics showed effects of significantly decreased alcohol consumption for the approach + PE group in the intention-to-treat and the merged motor avoidance group in the per-protocol analyses at post assessment compared with the WLC. Exploratory moderation analyses revealed that individuals with high visualization skills benefited most. The authors conclude that visualization training and motivational components may increase the efficacy and adherence of IR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.3010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.3010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imaginal retraining (IR) is an approach-avoidance procedure that has shown promising results in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to dismantle the efficacy of IR's components in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We conducted a RCT with nine conditions comprising eight intervention groups and a waitlist control group (WLC). Alcohol craving (primary outcome), consumption, depressive symptoms, quality of life, subjective appraisal, and side effects were assessed online at baseline, post intervention (6 weeks), and follow-up (12 weeks). The sample consisted of 426 participants (age: M = 47.22, SD = 11.82, women: 50.5%). The intervention groups received instructions for four different components of IR (mood induction, mental avoidance of unhealthy stimuli, motor avoidance of unhealthy stimuli, approach to healthy stimuli) that were each conveyed with or without prior psychoeducation (PE). The intervention was delivered online. At total of 163 individuals (42.9%) used the intervention at least once. No group differences were found for any primary or secondary outcome after Šidák correction. Uncorrected statistics showed effects of significantly decreased alcohol consumption for the approach + PE group in the intention-to-treat and the merged motor avoidance group in the per-protocol analyses at post assessment compared with the WLC. Exploratory moderation analyses revealed that individuals with high visualization skills benefited most. The authors conclude that visualization training and motivational components may increase the efficacy and adherence of IR.

Abstract Image

针对酗酒问题的想象力再训练随机对照试验:拆解研究。
意象再训练(IR)是一种接近-回避程序,在以往的研究中显示出良好的效果。本研究的目的是在随机对照试验(RCT)中分析意象再训练的有效性。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,共有九个条件,包括八个干预组和一个候补对照组(WLC)。在基线、干预后(6 周)和随访(12 周)期间,对酒精渴求(主要结果)、饮酒量、抑郁症状、生活质量、主观评价和副作用进行了在线评估。样本由 426 名参与者组成(年龄:男=47.22,女=11.82,女性:50.5%)。干预组接受了 IR 的四个不同组成部分(情绪诱导、心理回避不健康的刺激、运动回避不健康的刺激、接近健康的刺激)的指导,每个组成部分都在事先接受或不接受心理教育(PE)的情况下传达。干预以在线方式进行。共有 163 人(42.9%)至少使用过一次干预。经过希达克校正后,任何主要或次要结果均未发现组间差异。未经校正的统计结果显示,在意向治疗中,接近+PE组的酒精消耗量明显减少,在方案分析中,合并运动回避组的酒精消耗量在后期评估中与WLC组相比也有明显减少。探索性调节分析显示,可视化技能高的人受益最大。作者总结道,可视化训练和激励成分可提高 IR 的疗效和依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信