Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2024.2354868
Tiana J McMann, Michael R Haupt, Nicolette Le, Marielle E Meurice, Jiawei Li, Raphael E Cuomo, Tim K Mackey
{"title":"Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.","authors":"Tiana J McMann, Michael R Haupt, Nicolette Le, Marielle E Meurice, Jiawei Li, Raphael E Cuomo, Tim K Mackey","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2024.2354868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines abortion-related discourse on Twitter (X) pre-and post-Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, which eliminated the constitutional right to abortion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We used a custom data collection tool to collect tweets directly from Twitter using abortion-related keywords. We used the BERTopic language model and examined the top 30 retweeted and top 30 textually similar tweets from relevant topic clusters using an inductive coding approach. We also conducted statistical testing to assess potential associations between abortion themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>166,799 unique tweets were collected from December 2020-December 2022. 464 unique tweets were coded for abortion-related themes with 154 identified as relevant. Of these, 66 tweets marketed abortion pills, 17 tweets were identified as offering consultations, and 91 tweets were relevant to self-managed abortion. All marketing and consultation tweets were posted post-Dobbs decision and 7 (7.69%) of self-managed tweets were posted pre-Dobbs versus 84 (92.30%) posted post-Dobbs. A positive association was found between tweets offering a medical consultation with tweets marketing abortion pills and discussing self-managed abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study detected online marketing of abortion pills, consultations and discussions about self-managed abortion following the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. These results provide more context to the type of abortion-related information that is available online.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2354868","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines abortion-related discourse on Twitter (X) pre-and post-Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, which eliminated the constitutional right to abortion.

Study design: We used a custom data collection tool to collect tweets directly from Twitter using abortion-related keywords. We used the BERTopic language model and examined the top 30 retweeted and top 30 textually similar tweets from relevant topic clusters using an inductive coding approach. We also conducted statistical testing to assess potential associations between abortion themes.

Results: 166,799 unique tweets were collected from December 2020-December 2022. 464 unique tweets were coded for abortion-related themes with 154 identified as relevant. Of these, 66 tweets marketed abortion pills, 17 tweets were identified as offering consultations, and 91 tweets were relevant to self-managed abortion. All marketing and consultation tweets were posted post-Dobbs decision and 7 (7.69%) of self-managed tweets were posted pre-Dobbs versus 84 (92.30%) posted post-Dobbs. A positive association was found between tweets offering a medical consultation with tweets marketing abortion pills and discussing self-managed abortion.

Conclusion: This study detected online marketing of abortion pills, consultations and discussions about self-managed abortion following the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. These results provide more context to the type of abortion-related information that is available online.

多布斯诉杰克逊一案最高法院判决后,twitter 上的堕胎药营销和来源。
研究目的本研究探讨了多布斯诉杰克逊案(Dobbs v. Jackson)判决前后推特(X)上与堕胎相关的言论,该判决取消了宪法规定的堕胎权:研究设计:我们使用定制的数据收集工具,直接从 Twitter 上收集使用堕胎相关关键词的推文。我们使用了 BERTopic 语言模型,并采用归纳编码方法检查了相关主题集群中转发量最高的 30 条微博和文本相似度最高的 30 条微博。我们还进行了统计测试,以评估流产主题之间的潜在关联:我们在 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月期间收集了 166799 条推文。对 464 条独特的推文进行了人工流产相关主题编码,其中 154 条被确定为相关主题。其中,66 条推文营销堕胎药,17 条推文被确定为提供咨询,91 条推文与自我管理堕胎相关。所有营销和咨询推文都是在多布斯决定后发布的,7 条(7.69%)自我管理推文是在多布斯决定前发布的,而 84 条(92.30%)是在多布斯决定后发布的。提供医疗咨询的推文与推销堕胎药和讨论自我管理堕胎的推文之间存在正相关:本研究发现,在多布斯诉杰克逊案判决后,网上出现了推销堕胎药、咨询和讨论自我管理堕胎的推文。这些结果为网上流产相关信息的类型提供了更多的背景信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信