Development and Evaluation of a Reliable Medication Management Self-Assessment Checklist.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i1.5802
Brian J Isetts, Kristine M Talley, Ann M Brearley
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Reliable Medication Management Self-Assessment Checklist.","authors":"Brian J Isetts, Kristine M Talley, Ann M Brearley","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i1.5802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ability to effectively self-manage medications is the result of several factors influencing a person's decision to take medications. The need for new approaches to medication self-management are evident in the persistent trends of ineffective medication use and unfortunate consequences, referred to as drug-related morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, pioneering initiatives have emerged to reshape our approach for developing a rational organizational paradigm so that patients can confidently self-manage medications. Favorable outcomes of studies pertaining to the delivery of comprehensive medication therapy management services within the practice of pharmaceutical care prompts the question, 'Can patients and family members apply a consistent and systematic 4-step pharmacotherapy assessment process to better organize their decision-making and confidence in medication self-management?' To answer this question an Effective Medication Self-Management Toolkit based on this 4-step process, and a Medication Management Self-efficacy Checklist, were developed and evaluated for feasibility, acceptability, and internal consistency reliability. The first evaluation established the preliminary acceptability and feasibility of the toolkit using a convenience sample of 39 residents of independent living facilities in focus group sessions. All participants indicated they perceive that the 4-step process can help individuals successfully self-manage medications. At the conclusion of the focus group sessions, all 39 participants completed the 7-item post-session checklist. This paper presents the second evaluation to establish the internal consistency reliability of the toolkit's Medication Management Self-efficacy Checklist using Cronbach's alpha. There was good internal consistency of the self-efficacy checklist with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.82. This investigation of a novel approach for applying the 4-step pharmacotherapy assessment process by patients suggests that the medication self-efficacy checklist provides a reliable and useful measure of a patient's confidence in self-managing medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i1.5802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ability to effectively self-manage medications is the result of several factors influencing a person's decision to take medications. The need for new approaches to medication self-management are evident in the persistent trends of ineffective medication use and unfortunate consequences, referred to as drug-related morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, pioneering initiatives have emerged to reshape our approach for developing a rational organizational paradigm so that patients can confidently self-manage medications. Favorable outcomes of studies pertaining to the delivery of comprehensive medication therapy management services within the practice of pharmaceutical care prompts the question, 'Can patients and family members apply a consistent and systematic 4-step pharmacotherapy assessment process to better organize their decision-making and confidence in medication self-management?' To answer this question an Effective Medication Self-Management Toolkit based on this 4-step process, and a Medication Management Self-efficacy Checklist, were developed and evaluated for feasibility, acceptability, and internal consistency reliability. The first evaluation established the preliminary acceptability and feasibility of the toolkit using a convenience sample of 39 residents of independent living facilities in focus group sessions. All participants indicated they perceive that the 4-step process can help individuals successfully self-manage medications. At the conclusion of the focus group sessions, all 39 participants completed the 7-item post-session checklist. This paper presents the second evaluation to establish the internal consistency reliability of the toolkit's Medication Management Self-efficacy Checklist using Cronbach's alpha. There was good internal consistency of the self-efficacy checklist with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.82. This investigation of a novel approach for applying the 4-step pharmacotherapy assessment process by patients suggests that the medication self-efficacy checklist provides a reliable and useful measure of a patient's confidence in self-managing medications.

开发和评估可靠的药物管理自我评估核对表。
有效自我管理药物的能力是影响个人服药决定的多种因素共同作用的结果。无效用药和不幸后果(即与药物相关的发病率和死亡率)的持续趋势表明,我们需要新的药物自我管理方法。幸运的是,已经出现了一些开创性的举措来重塑我们的方法,以制定合理的组织范式,使患者能够自信地进行自我药物管理。有关在药物治疗实践中提供全面的药物治疗管理服务的研究取得了良好的成果,这促使我们提出这样一个问题:"患者和家属能否应用一致而系统的四步药物治疗评估流程,更好地组织他们的决策,增强他们对药物自我管理的信心?为了回答这个问题,我们开发了基于这 4 个步骤的有效药物自我管理工具包和药物管理自我效能检查表,并对其可行性、可接受性和内部一致性可靠性进行了评估。首次评估在焦点小组会议中对 39 名独立生活设施的居民进行了抽样调查,初步确定了工具包的可接受性和可行性。所有参与者都表示,他们认为 4 步流程可以帮助个人成功地自我管理药物。在焦点小组会议结束后,所有 39 名参与者都填写了 7 个项目的会后核对表。本文采用克朗巴赫α对工具包的用药管理自我效能检查表进行了第二次评估,以确定其内部一致性可靠性。自我效能检查表的内部一致性良好,Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.82。这项对患者应用四步药物治疗评估流程的新方法的调查表明,药物治疗自我效能检查表是衡量患者自我药物治疗信心的可靠而有用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信